今早為Asian Medical Students Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK)的新一屆執行委員會就職典禮作致詞分享嘉賓,題目為「疫情中的健康不公平」。
感謝他們的熱情款待以及為整段致詞拍了影片。以下我附上致詞的英文原稿:
It's been my honor to be invited to give the closing remarks for the Inauguration Ceremony for the incoming executive committee of the Asian Medical Students' Association Hong Kong (AMSAHK) this morning. A video has been taken for the remarks I made regarding health inequalities during the COVID-19 pandemic (big thanks to the student who withstood the soreness of her arm for holding the camera up for 15 minutes straight), and here's the transcript of the main body of the speech that goes with this video:
//The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, continues to be rampant around the world since early 2020, resulting in more than 55 million cases and 1.3 million deaths worldwide as of today. (So no! It’s not a hoax for those conspiracy theorists out there!) A higher rate of incidence and deaths, as well as worse health-related quality of life have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, including people of lower socioeconomic position, older persons, migrants, ethnic minority and communities of color, etc. While epidemiologists and scientists around the world are dedicated in gathering scientific evidence on the specific causes and determinants of the health inequalities observed in different countries and regions, we can apply the Social Determinants of Health Conceptual Framework developed by the World Health Organization team led by the eminent Prof Sir Michael Marmot, world’s leading social epidemiologist, to understand and delineate these social determinants of health inequalities related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
According to this framework, social determinants of health can be largely categorized into two types – 1) the lower stream, intermediary determinants, and 2) the upper stream, structural and macro-environmental determinants. For the COVID-19 pandemic, we realized that the lower stream factors may include material circumstances, such as people’s living and working conditions. For instance, the nature of the occupations of these people of lower socioeconomic position tends to require them to travel outside to work, i.e., they cannot work from home, which is a luxury for people who can afford to do it. This lack of choice in the location of occupation may expose them to greater risk of infection through more transportation and interactions with strangers. We have also seen infection clusters among crowded places like elderly homes, public housing estates, and boarding houses for foreign domestic helpers. Moreover, these socially disadvantaged people tend to have lower financial and social capital – it can be observed that they were more likely to be deprived of personal protective equipment like face masks and hand sanitizers, especially during the earlier days of the pandemic. On the other hand, the upper stream, structural determinants of health may include policies related to public health, education, macroeconomics, social protection and welfare, as well as our governance… and last, but not least, our culture and values. If the socioeconomic and political contexts are not favorable to the socially disadvantaged, their health and well-being will be disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Therefore, if we, as a society, espouse to address and reduce the problem of health inequalities, social determinants of health cannot be overlooked in devising and designing any public health-related strategies, measures and policies.
Although a higher rate of incidence and deaths have been widely observed in the socially disadvantaged groups, especially in countries with severe COVID-19 outbreaks, this phenomenon seems to be less discussed and less covered by media in Hong Kong, where the disease incidence is relatively low when compared with other countries around the world. Before the resurgence of local cases in early July, local spread of COVID-19 was sporadic and most cases were imported. In the earlier days of the pandemic, most cases were primarily imported by travelers and return-students studying overseas, leading to a minor surge between mid-March and mid-April of 874 new cases. Most of these cases during Spring were people who could afford to travel and study abroad, and thus tended to be more well-off. Therefore, some would say the expected social gradient in health impact did not seem to exist in Hong Kong, but may I remind you that, it is only the case when we focus on COVID-19-specific incidence and mortality alone. But can we really deduce from this that COVID-19-related health inequality does not exist in Hong Kong? According to the Social Determinants of Health Framework mentioned earlier, the obvious answer is “No, of course not.” And here’s why…
In addition to the direct disease burden, the COVID-19 outbreak and its associated containment measures (such as economic lockdown, mandatory social distancing, and change of work arrangements) could have unequal wider socioeconomic impacts on the general population, especially in regions with pervasive existing social inequalities. Given the limited resources and capacity of the socioeconomically disadvantaged to respond to emergency and adverse events, their general health and well-being are likely to be unduly and inordinately affected by the abrupt changes in their daily economic and social conditions, like job loss and insecurity, brought about by the COVID-19 outbreak and the corresponding containment and mitigation measures of which the main purpose was supposedly disease prevention and health protection at the first place. As such, focusing only on COVID-19 incidence or mortality as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities may leave out important aspects of life that contributes significantly to people’s health. Recently, my research team and I collaborated with Sir Michael Marmot in a Hong Kong study, and found that the poor people in Hong Kong fared worse in every aspects of life than their richer counterparts in terms of economic activity, personal protective equipment, personal hygiene practice, as well as well-being and health after the COVID-19 outbreak. We also found that part of the observed health inequality can be attributed to the pandemic and its related containment measures via people’s concerns over their own and their families’ livelihood and economic activity. In other words, health inequalities were contributed by the pandemic even in a city where incidence is relatively low through other social determinants of health that directly concerned the livelihood and economic activity of the people. So in this study, we confirmed that focusing only on the incident and death cases as the outcomes of concern to address health inequalities is like a story half-told, and would severely truncate and distort the reality.
Truth be told, health inequality does not only appear after the pandemic outbreak of COVID-19, it is a pre-existing condition in countries and regions around the world, including Hong Kong. My research over the years have consistently shown that people in lower socioeconomic position tend to have worse physical and mental health status. Nevertheless, precisely because health inequality is nothing new, there are always voices in our society trying to dismiss the problem, arguing that it is only natural to have wealth inequality in any capitalistic society. However, in reckoning with health inequalities, we need to go beyond just figuring out the disparities or differences in health status between the poor and the rich, and we need to raise an ethically relevant question: are these inequalities, disparities and differences remediable? Can they be fixed? Can we do something about them? If they are remediable, and we can do something about them but we haven’t, then we’d say these inequalities are ultimately unjust and unfair. In other words, a society that prides itself in pursuing justice must, and I say must, strive to address and reduce these unfair health inequalities. Borrowing the words from famed sociologist Judith Butler, “the virus alone does not discriminate,” but “social and economic inequality will make sure that it does.” With COVID-19, we learn that it is not only the individuals who are sick, but our society. And it’s time we do something about it.
Thank you very much!//
Please join me in congratulating the incoming executive committee of AMSAHK and giving them the best wishes for their future endeavor!
Roger Chung, PhD
Assistant Professor, CUHK JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, @CUHK Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong 香港中文大學 - CUHK
Associate Director, CUHK Institute of Health Equity
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
social gathering中文 在 觀光客不知道的倫敦 Facebook 的最佳貼文
[Away We Go]工作室報告日
***12月5日更新***
12月8日 3-5pm 聖誕花圈手作聚會 workshop + social gathering
運用郊野撿拾的素材,親手作一個聖誕花圈。熱紅酒、乾果餡餅、現磨咖啡、手作點心作伴,嘻哈閒聊聖誕節的小典故,體驗手作的療癒力,以及在地生活的聖誕習俗。我們教您一步一步做出花圈,最後您可以將這個充滿森林氣息的花圈帶回家。
>地點在Chalk Farm 地鐵站附近走路10分鐘的溫馨居家小廚房
>小團活動最多六人
>不需要任何花藝或園藝背景與經驗,只要帶著微笑來(或是不要笑也沒關係,保證不去逗你笑,ㄎㄎ)。
>材料都幫您準備好了,也歡迎帶自己收集/撿拾的素材來妝點您的花圈。
>熱飲茶點都包含在費用中,還有機會拿到手作蘋果醬或是蛋糕食譜(我們的host還沒決定這一天做什麼點心...)
費用:£45/人,雙人同行預約特價£75/2人
到2019年1月前沒有大眾團活動,2019年一日遊活動近日公布。
***
歡迎私訊討論\報名(未註明時數為10小時, 所有活動費用不含餐飲與入場費,除非特別聲明)
如果以上行程沒有適合您的日期,也歡迎詢問,有些團的時間可以調動。
簡介:
以上深度旅遊活動由《觀光客不知道的倫敦》作者(AwayWeGo 工作室)設計規劃、帶領、中文導覽。大眾旅遊滿六人可出小巴士團,一名、兩名都能報名,再為您揪團招募其它成員。
特色是先透過私訊討論,根據您的興趣或日期,修改成更個人化的行程,讓您用團體遊的價格達成私人團的風格旅行。因此也可以設計成搭火車旅遊,像在地人一樣玩。由於每個團的路線與行程略為不同,請來信詢問細節。其它時間、路線與主題的團體活動歡迎提議。
也歡迎您與親朋好友自組ㄧ團由我為您私人導覽,私人團會根據人數、天數、交通、行程內容與解說深度等條件另外提供報價。也可以參考團體行程改做您的私人團。也可提供地陪服務(市區導覽,或您自行安排出城交通)。
常見問題答案看這裡:
1.一日遊由倫敦ㄧ區內出發。
2.出發時間在8:00-9:00之間,視季節、行程與團員喜好事先討論決定。如果當天由外地前來倫敦參加請事先告知,夏季可能安排於9:00am出發。
3.基本行程10小時,含巴斯或史特拉福行程的一日遊為11小時。
4.費用含租用專業司機的車資、我的規劃諮詢與解說,不含餐飲。巨石陣、溫莎堡、利茲堡入場需要先預訂並代收門票費。
5.中文團,我親自帶領(博物館學/歷史學/社會學背景),使用合法出租車與專業司機,司機有空休息不過勞。
6.一人也可報名、提議揪團(請多留幾個日期供選擇,只指定ㄧ個日期比較不易湊到人)。
7.幼兒也需一個座位,且需要汽車安全椅座,可代您準備,可能酌收費用。當一團有六名以上全額成人參加時,兒童優待10鎊。
8.大眾團(揪團)之外可以私人包團、不需包車的徒步導覽、或不需解說的地陪服務,另行報價。
9.接機服務可幫你代訂,免費給參活動者的服務,或酌收代辦的時間成本費。
10.來信詢問/報名請說明希望報名人數、在倫敦的日期,多幾個日期比較容易湊團。
11.報名或揪團時還不需付費,確認出團才付款。
12. 因為過夜團成本高,大眾團揪團不易且需要提早四個月以上規劃討論,如果您期望出遊日期不是台灣連續假期、或您的團體人數在四人以下,較難肯定何時可以宣布成團。