🌻Docusign(DOCU), Crowdstrike(CRWD)財報結果
上週這兩家公司發表財報了.
這兩天看了一下他們的財報結果. Again, 兩家的表現都很好, 但發現分析師給DOCU的調價(往上)幅度比較多, 就好奇研究了一下SaaS公司是怎麼被估值的. 有興趣的話可以看看(從中學習到很多. 非常推薦一讀):
https://makingsenseofusastocks.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html
(By the way, 分析師對CRWD的價格調幅沒那麼大, 主因是成長趨緩了. 而DOCU的free cash flow佔營收比, 以及顧客黏著力在這季創了新高, 是讓分析師按讚的幾個原因).
關於CRWD: "The Street is already modeling revenue growth deceleration in 2022 to 36%, down from 60% expected in 2021, which on its own might prove a hurdle for a stock already trading at a high multiple," said Bank of America analyst Tal Liani in a report.
分析師對於DOCU的評價:
• 11位buy; 給的價格分別是: $310, $320 (x2), $330 (x2), $340 (x2), $345, $350, $350, $389
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst continues to view them as a best in class way to play digital transformation trends with strong growth, cash flow and profitability, and a strong competitive position. Power said DocuSign remains one of his top long-term compounding growth ideas.
o Citi: While slightly shy of the double-digit billings beat in recent quarters, DocuSign still delivered a solid 8% beat to Q2 billings, which grew 47% year-over-year, Radke tells investors in a research note.
o Evercore ISI: he calls "another strong quarter." While some may have wanted to see more aggressive Q3 billings guidance, he believes estimates "continue to leave room for upside," Materne said.
o JMP Securities: While revenue growth decelerated to 50% from 58% in Q1, the company is the clear leader in electronic signature and the broader system of agreement having crossed over 1M customers with a $2B run rate this quarter, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that he sees lots of room for growth as DocuSign targets a $50B total addressable market.
o Needham: The analyst commented, "Docusign reported another strong quarter in 2QF22 with typical DOCU upside to revenue and profitability. Sales metrics and growth decelerated Q/Q, as we expected against a massive pandemic quarter, but at a much slower rate than we believe much of the Street was anticipating. 65k net new customers was lower than the 70k - 90 range of CY20 but was still more than 2x greater than any pre-pandemic quarter, highlighting a strong end-market driving 47% billings growth against a strong comp. Commentary on incremental Agreement Cloud demand was positive, suggesting an additional growth tailwind combined with solid international can further aid 2HF22. Although DOCU shares could be lower near-term due to weak 2H OpMg guidance, we think this guidance is conservative, as the recent OM was greater than the pre-pandemic level even with tough comps."
o RBC Capital: The quarter highlighted the sustainability of the company's tailwinds post-pandemic as most of its underlying metrics such as billings and net revenue retention were solid, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that the traction with CLM and Notary was also "impressive".
分析師對於CRWD的評價:
• 12位buy; 給的價格分別是: $300, $310 (x2), $313, $315 (x2) , $305, $320, $325, $330 (x2), $340
• 1位給hold: $280 (from $220 by J.P. Morgan(same))
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst believes the company has significant room for growth with core modules, opportunities with Humio and in cloud workload security, among others, should help drive a continuation of strong growth over a long time horizon.
o BTIG: The company's "strong" Q2 results "cleared every hurdle", even though the buy-side benchmarks may have been slightly higher, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Powell adds that Crowdstrike is clearly gaining share in its core endpoint security target market at a rapid pace and gaining traction with new products across multiple categories.
o Canaccord: The analyst said the stock is down from its recent highs, and he thinks the re-rating creates a more favorable entry point for longer-oriented investors for a foundational security name. He views Crowdstrike as a long-term secular winner in security due to its native cloud platform advantage versus closely held peers in endpoint security combined with platform expansion into tangential segments to capture greater share of security budgets.
o Goldman Sachs: CrowdStrike last night delivered "another beat and raise quarter as the company benefited from another quarter of elevated demand," Essex said. But it traded lower following net new annual recurring revenue growth guidance that was slightly less than investors had hoped for. Essex, nonetheless, said the quarter demonstrated CrowdStrike's "ability to continue to go down market efficiently."
o JMP Securities: The analyst notes the company's Q2 annualized recurring revenue of $1.34B topping his estimate of $1.30B, with "sustained" 70% ARR and revenue growth along with margin upside seen as key highlights for the quarter. Suppiger adds that the metrics reflect Crowdstrike's "strong execution and robust demand environment".
o Mizuho: "very good" fiscal Q2 results. The annual recurring revenue growth of 70% year-over-year "was strong and still nicely surpassed" the Street's 65%-66% estimate, Moskowitz tells investors in a research note. He believes "strong execution can propel" Crowdstrike's stock higher.
o Piper Sandler: The company's metrics "outperformed across the board" in Q2 with 70% annual recurring revenue and revenue growth and record net new customer adds in the quarter, Owens tells investors in a research note.
o RBC Capital: Hedberg adds that CrowdStrike's record pipeline entering Q3 should continue to fuel the company's "land-and-expand" momentum.
o Stifel: Q2 results that he said "exceeded consensus estimates across all major financial metrics." He continues to believe that Crowdstrike's growth opportunity "remains in the early days" despite the company's scale given continued share capture within its core endpoint security market and incremental module adoption on the Falcon Platform, Reback tells investors.
o UBS: the company reported "pretty good" Q2 results against high expectations.
🌻趨勢: 跨境電商 Cross-border commerce
Morgan Stanley:
From our perspective, we think many are underestimating what the cross-border eCommerce demand could ultimately be, once key friction points like FX rates, tax and duties, shipping, language, etc are smoothed—all issues that Global-E directly addresses.
Cross-border ecommerce brings new, high-yield volume: We think elevated levels of cross-border ecommerce (ex-travel) is a structural shift thathas yet to be fully contemplated in MA (and V)'s long-term forecasts. MA's cross-border CNP ex-travel volume was 69% above 2019's level in 2Q and 63% higher in 1Q. Strength reflects both broader ecommerce adoption plus globalization of commerce, as marketplaces and services that reduce cross-border friction (such as those from GLBE) make international online ordering more readily adopted. Early data at V suggests greater cross-border ecommerce spend is persisting even in areas with pre-pandemic levels of international travel. Cross-border transactions also come at a higher yield, making us more optimistic that the trend can bring incremental long-term growth to the networks.
產業的潮流是有連貫性的. 疫情讓電商更發達後, 接下來應該就是加速電商跨境了. 跨境的話, 有很多問題需要解決(稅率, 語言, etc.) 這就需要有公司來做整合的動作. 這種跨境, 也可以想像是omnichannel的一種呈現.
Harley Finkelstein (President of Shopify): "I mean I think commerce in 2021 is cross-border."
🌻SPAC熱潮退卻,初創市值蒸發750億美元
"SPAC熱潮已經退卻。分析顯示,在2月中旬以前完成合併的137家SPAC的總市值已經蒸發25%,市值回落幅度上個月一度超過1,000億美元。"
"像貝萊德(BlackRock Inc., BLK)和富達投資(Fidelity Investments Inc.)這類企業管理的基金,以及許多對沖基金、養老金管理公司和其他一些投資者,都在SPAC的回落中遭受了衝擊,他們在去年年底開始的熱潮中競相投資SPAC。其中許多基金由於在價格還很低的時候就早早入場,所以現在仍坐擁可觀收益。事實上,SPAC市值仍有約2,500億美元,高於一年前的約1,000億美元,反映出這期間股價上漲和新公司上市的影響。
但即便如此,今年年初令人炫目的回報還是讓許多後來者做了接盤俠,扎堆投資所謂穩賺不賠的領域,其永恆的風險可見一斑。在過去的幾個月裡,一些投資者眼睜睜看著帳面財富縮水。"
"股價下跌會在SPAC領域形成惡性循環,因為投資者有權在併購交易前從空白支票公司撤資。一旦SPAC跌破發行價,投資者就更有可能這樣做,而許多SPAC的股價現在正處於這樣的水平。目前,在尚未宣布併購交易的空白支票公司中,超過95%的公司股價低於發行價。
投資者的大規模撤資會讓已經上市的空白支票公司手上的現金大幅減少,讓其更難實現業務目標,並可能加劇股價跌勢。"
https://on.wsj.com/3n6JznC
🌻BNPL (buy now pay later)
But most BNPL providers including Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay have been losing money despite breakneck revenue growth as they invest heavily in marketing to win share. Sweden-based Klarna’s credit losses more than doubled in the second quarter. Affirm has projected adjusted operating losses of $50m-$55m for the fiscal year that ended June 30.
The path to profitability for many of these companies was to achieve massive scale, analysts said.
https://www.ft.com/content/ca201a37-a16d-4223-b123-04d38350a972
Pictures: 一葉知秋; from EarningsWhispers
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
share stock分別 在 葉朗程 Facebook 的最佳貼文
夜空繁星滿佈,凌晨。
淺水灣沙灘對出的停車處內有一部黑色 SUV。
車沒有震,司機的卻心在亂跳。
「食唔食雪條?」我看著不遠處的便利店。
「好提議,」她那張完全沒有維吾爾族血統但又很維吾爾族的臉讓人百看不厭。
關掉引擎,下車,向便利店的方向慢慢走。
手臂碰到手臂,就是那一瞬間,不知從哪裏來的勇氣,我拖著她的手,十指緊扣。
她沒有鬆開。
當她宣佈要結婚的時候,我的心碎了一地。日子久了,各有各的生活,以為自己適應了「往後不會再有她」的世界,怎料到她離婚,那種由丹田湧上來的興奮令我意識到,我其實是那麼的呼之則來。
真的,我其實很喜歡看其他 KOL 的文章,尤其是柳爺寫的。人要學懂從新出發,便要學懂從心出發,世界有很多面,以前去不到那一面,可能是更美的一面。
我學懂放下,懂到一個點,有些朋友覺得我寫的東西有點和尚,但畢竟是凡人,原來放下只是自我安慰的療程,當那種默契再出現,我便知道自己從來沒有放下過。
便利店內,她站在雜誌架前面看,我走到雪櫃然後再畀錢,給了她其中一支雪條,離開。
不用問她想吃什麼味道,不用問她要不要買哪本雜誌,沒有一句話,每個動作順利完成,我真是一個默契撚,同一個頻道的交流,美妙得不能言喻。
有人問過我怎樣可以籌劃一次浪漫的約會,呢個問題,我真心覺得 on 9,因為約會有得 plan,但浪漫係永遠冇得 plan。所謂浪漫,就是一個 magical moment,而一個正常人是沒有可能 plan for something magical to happen 的。
走到其中一張長凳之前,我跑到車內拿出一支蚊怕水。
「Oh my god,Marcus Yip,點解會有支蚊怕水?你一早 plan 咗嚟呢度?」
「唔知呢,」我笑著噴了在她身上幾下。
噴完,才發覺自己有點蠢,蚊怕水大概沾了在雪條上。
於是我跟她交換雪條。
「點解要換?」她問。
「驚你嗰支有蚊怕水,我唔想你死。」
她立刻又再交換,說:「你覺得我想你死咩?」
聽完佢呢句,我一生無求了。
棄掉那支蚊怕水雪條,我與她 share 剩下那一支,坐在長凳上,我忍不住笑。
「Why are you smiling?」
「我覺得呢支雪條嘅味道好特別。」
「如果你話特別甜,我會覺得你好 lame。」她吃了一口,再把雪條給我。
「兩個人 share 一支雪條,我哋呢個年紀,」我吃了一口,把最後一口留給她,「唔係甜,係青春。」
有人跟我說,水份呀、運動呀、護膚呀,當然可以令你更青春,但其實最令人青春的,是人對戀愛的渴求。
有些人四十幾歲單身,看起來很老;有些人五十幾歲單身,看起來像三十。當中的分別,就是有些人是 prepared to be in love anytime,但有些人早早已經放棄了。
人去到某個年紀,要知道自己唔係淨係得搵錢呢盤棋要行,仲有家庭呢盤棋、愛情呢盤棋、或者改變世界呢盤棋。
今晚,我要在愛情這盤棋上,踏出大膽一步。
回到車上,空氣靜止。
「我嗰日喺 Pacific Place 泊車,」我清一清嗓子,沒有正視她說,「差少少 spending 先有得免費泊,嗰陣一時之間諗唔到買咩好。」
「通常你用得呢啲咁無厘頭嘅開場白,」她也沒有正視我說,「後面一定有個好嚴重嘅要求。」
屌,佢真係 read 到晒我,但我當聽唔到佢講嘢。
「咁啱我喺嗰層,咪買吓啲落妝水呀、面膜呀、嗰啲女人嘢囉。」
「啊,你想話你每晚都有女仔上你屋企瞓,所以要 stock up?」
「我係想話,買咗咁耐都冇人用,你有冇興趣今晚試吓?」
「唔會喇,」她說,然後從那個藍色 Prada 手袋內,拿了一個白色瓶子出來,「唔知點解,今晚,咁啱得咁橋,我有帶落妝水。」
有些事,我們可能每天都在期待,期待了很多天,期待了很多年。
但期待其實很累,也很浪費時間,而命運的安排就是這麼有趣。
你越是期待,就越不會發生。
與其精神崩潰地期待,不如實實在在做好自己。
當你過好自己的每一天,好事原來總會發生在你身上,而這件好事,往往比期待的更好。
share stock分別 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
[101]傳Amazon拆股摶入道指,但點解要拆股先入到?道指又點計?又有幾低能?
==============
2021比別人知得多。subscribe now(https://bityl.co/4Y0h)。Ivan Patreon,港美市場評點,專題號外,每日一圖,好文推介。每星期6篇,月費80,半年已1600人訂! 畀年費仲有85折
TLDR:拆細可能有誘因,但,真係要入道指?
1. 雖然好多嘢寫,但都寫埋呢單先。話Amazon會拆股,今次業績就會公佈。咁今次業績係幾時?係美股星期四收市後,即係香港星期五天光之前。
2. 呢單都幾神奇,早幾日由狐狸台記者Charles Gasparino獨家爆料。冇乜詳情,只係引述消息人士,話會令到光頭佬Jeff Bezos拋離 Tesla嘅Elon Musk,更加鞏固首富地位云云。因為拆股就會令Amazon成為道指成份股。出完個 tweet後,股價即時彈咗2%,當然股票唔會話你知點解升。實情股票一年250個交易,有大新聞嘅可能得20日?
3. 會定唔會?好快你就知。不過即使Amazon冇拆股,記者亦可以堅持話「因為我篤爆咗佢先縮沙」,量子力學咁,觀測者改變埋個結果(嚴格嚟講:觀測者唔應該評論啦,你做實驗睇光子都唔會吹氣),難以驗證。
4. 呢個猜測一直都有,而近年大家知,蘋果拆過股,Tesla亦都拆過。Amazon會跟亦唔奇,而如果係做嘅,公佈業績時做埋亦好合理。
5. 更重要嘅係,Amazon之前亦都拆過三次股,分別係1997年,同1999年(一年拆兩次)。不過,亦都要問,對上一次拆股超過20年前,做乜過去咁多年唔做,而家忽然改變主意?
6. 先講記者答案:為咗有得入道指,進一步拋離Elon Musk.呢度就可以講多少少。冇錯,Amazon並唔係道指成份股。FAAMG之中,只有蘋果同Microsoft 係道指成份股,Facebook Amazon Google 都唔係。原因?我都唔知,你去問班委員,透明度好低的。
7. 肯定嘅係,雖然全部係「道瓊斯工業平均指數」,但並唔一定要工業股先入選。
8. 不過有一個問題,之前都講過(懶搵舊文),道指係十分古老嘅東西,清朝(冇呃你!)產物,差不多140年歷史。咁當年計算工具同而家爭好遠,所以佢啲嘢十分求其(下面會詳細講),亦因為顧及計算方便(*)。之但係,為咗傳統,就咁多年都冇改,就出現好多問題了。
9. 有名你叫,道瓊斯工業平均指數,就真係30隻嘅平均。點平均法?最初就係30隻嘅股價,加埋佢,咪指數咯。易計嘛!清朝咋大佬,將就下啦。
10. 後來都差不多,只係多咗Divisor,你加埋晒30隻成份股嘅股價,再除返呢個Divisor.而家嘅Divisor大約係0.152(聰明嘅你可以諗下,點解會細過1,附注會答)(**)。咁你問,點計呢個Divisor?可以寫多幾千字講,但實務上,Google 或者搵 Wikipedia啦!仲清朝咩!
11. 都話,撇除咗個Divisor影響,道指就係30隻嘅股價加埋一齊。咁戇居都得?就係咁戇居!有乜戇居?好簡單,你諗下兩隻份股,如果一隻而家500蚊,另一隻1蚊,咁有乜後果?即係1蚊嗰隻,基本上升幾倍或跌九成都唔會有影響。500蚊嗰隻?我升1%,對個指數等於你1蚊嗰隻升5倍!亦即係話,股價大嘅公司,對指數嘅影響力就大好多!
12. 冇錯,任何股票指數,都會有啲權重(equal weights嘅例外)(***),weights,加權平均數,我年代中四定中五數學要學。咁你每隻成份股佔幾多比重,就各司各法了。
13. 一般現世做嘅,都係market cap weighted,頂多有啲調整。恒指係咁,標普指數係咁。但道指因為係清朝嘅嘢,就用stock price嚟做weight
14. 咁有乜問題?因為個「股價」per se,係冇意義的嘛!A公司股價高過B公司,不等於佢大過B公司喎。我升1蚊可能係100%,佢升一蚊係0.1%,點可以放埋一齊比?
15. 所以,之前蘋果咪有呢啲咁搞笑嘅嘢,原本在道指嘅比重大約係12%,一拆四之後呢,變咗比重係4%,係咪夠低能?
16. 講咗咁耐,咁同Amazon有乜關係?關係就大。一般相信,Amazon同Google,入唔到道指,就係因為個「股價」太大。我懶慢慢計,但而家道指最重磅嘅係United Health,股價4舊水,佔比重已經7% — 咁我放隻3500蚊嘅Amazon入去,加埋隻2400蚊嘅Google,其實係咪睇呢兩隻得了?
17. 冇錯,道指是一個很低能嘅指數,所以真係「專業」嘅都會講標普指數,例如你見比較啲股市表現呀,都應該用標普。唯獨咩情況會用道指?你見啲要做到好耐data嘅就會,因為標普指數係1957年嘅產物,戰後嘅事。
18. 而媒體照報道指,只係因為習慣,亦因為傳統。扯開少少,同樣地,恒指都係麻麻地,但當然已經後生過道指好多,所以冇呢啲問題。但你見「機構投資者」,好多都睇MSCI 香港指數—咁所以,你話港股咁多年冇寸進嘅,睇你睇乜指數啫。
19. 好啦,講咗咁多,如果Amazon想入道指,應該就一定要拆股啦(雖然拆左亦不代表一定入到)。之但係,有冇諗一個問題:入嚟做乜?又或者,搞咗咁多年都冇入,離埋婚拆多份畀前妻上埋富豪榜,都仲係首富,做乜仲要理咩入道指?
20. 記者講法話,可以令佢身家進一步拋離Elon Musk,我就唔知個邏輯在邊。即管當光頭佬會care,但點解入道指就會身家升?入道指股價就會升?似乎唔係好站得住腳吧。有都只係暫時,同基本因素冇乜關。仲要根本追蹤標指嘅基金大過道指好多。
21. 記住,David Webb(唔係講廣東話嗰個)提過好傳神嘅比喻:你個pizza切多幾切,唔會多咗啲(嚴格嚟講少咗添,餅碎又冇咗啲,把刀又痴實一啲)。
22. 你拆股,拆幾多次都得,但點會影響股價?呢個亦係我見親啲人話煤氣「送紅股」嘅搞笑。屌你,送紅股咪即係拆股!
23. 咁至於點解啲公司咁鍾意拆股?官方答案話,提高流動性。即係可能一手長實定騰訊定港交所 十幾廿萬(冇check),太貴,散戶買唔起咁。當然實際上,就同點解啲公司供股用埋啲仆街比較一樣,點解要咩13供5呀咁,咪會有大量碎股,咪可以搵鳩你笨收埋你。間間都係咁玩,包括匯控渣打。
24. 之但係,喂,美股係冇一手手架嘛!所以根本冇呢回事。咁點解仲要拆細?可能就真係為咗降低入場費:但,你問我,一股Amazon都係三萬蚊港紙有找,一股都買唔起嘅,不如都係專心讀書返工?
25. 但但但,時代唔同嘛,而家YOLO嘛,鬼佬連登仔嘛,咁你三千幾蚊美金一股,可能啲網友就真係冇乜動力咯。所以,講到尾,可能都真係吸到多啲散戶?
26. 又然後,美股雖然冇一手手,但如果啲股票一路唔拆,升到幾萬美金一股,咁咪變咗又係入場費好高?不過其實而家可以買Fractional share的(****)
27. 無論如何,你睇到篇文時,應該已經有答案。你話睇咗咁多對你賺錢有冇幫助?冇乜,但咪識多啲嘢。況且,Patreon一早寫咗啲對你賺錢有幫助嘅嘢啦
==============
2021比別人知得多。subscribe now(https://bityl.co/4Y0h)。Ivan Patreon,港美市場評點,專題號外,每日一圖,好文推介。每星期6篇,月費80,半年已1600人訂! 畀年費仲有85折
==============
(*)正如有一段好長嘅時間(講緊我睇銀行股時都仲係咁!),中國加息減息係要0.27 0.36咁去的,十分低能。點解唔係0.25?因為 0.27 0.36 之類畀9除得盡,易計啲。咁你話9/365 咪又係一堆混吉?錯,佢地用360的。
(**)開估:好簡單,因為啲股票不停咁拆,所以個Divisor要一路縮細先令指數在拆估前後冇變(呢度唔解了)。但點解股票不停拆?因為股票係不停升嘅。又學到嘢了。
(***)冇錯係有equal weight嘅指數,美股都幾常用。但,equal weight咪即係全部權重都係1,一樣有。正如唔選擇都係一種選擇。
(****)呢度真係要搞清楚,有人話Fractional share係碎股,完全錯。Odd lot 先係碎股。香港要一手手買,咁唔足一手嘅咪odd lot,你可以買1股港交所。咁你話,有乜分別?我可以買0.1股 Google,有乜分別?—分別就大啦。你渣住1股港交所,就係股東,你可以入場媽叉李小加或者歐冠昇,1股都係股東,根據我理解佢不能唔畀你入場。之但係,你渣0.1股Google,你就應該冇得入場媽叉皮猜。我唔100%肯定,但就我理解,渣住0.1股嘅唔係股東。法律上最低單位就係1股。你可以去試下。咁你話你唔使媽叉人唔使食西餅嘅,有乜分別?應該冇乜嘅。之但係,美股一股都買唔起嘅,我勸你都係專心返工讀書吧啦。