【研究推薦】Be Water, My Friend 解放新.海洋空間想像 #都市化洋謀 #9月專研
提到海,大部分香港人大概會想起與樓價密切相關的海景、娛樂化的水上活動、貴價深海海鮮食材、人工沙灘,或不時有臭味的海濱長廊,以至填海、明日大嶼願景,而理解海洋本身似乎一片空白,彷彿只有在以上商業及地產框架內,海洋才有其價值。除此之外,究竟我們應該如何理解海洋?
一篇2015年由英國杜倫大學地理學系教授 Philip Steinberg及英國威爾斯亞伯立斯威大學地理及地球科學學系學系學者 Kimberley Peters發佈有關「海洋本體論」的學術文章 ”Wet Ontologies, Fluid Spaces: Giving Depth to Volume through Oceanic Thinking”。文章帶領我們離開以人類為中心、以陸地為主的視野,由本體論(ontology)的角度重新認識海洋的運動(motion)、流動性(fluidity)、深度(depth)、容量(volume)以及隨性(randomness)等特性,簡而言之,就是從海洋本身出發,去問海洋是甚麼?
這正好回應,現時海洋簡單地被視為可被「填平」的空間,將海洋中的特性視如無物,亦不清楚陸地與海洋規劃的分別,有時甚至連填海物料也不太清楚是什麼。這種思維正進一步收窄我們對於海洋的空間想像,讓我們應對「明日大嶼」等填海計劃時亦顯得乏力。
文中一開頭引用德國法學家施密特(Carl Schmitt) 於”The Nomos of the Earth” 一文中,認為海洋並沒有特性,除了海浪就只有海浪(The sea has no character, ...... On the waves there is nothing but waves)。撇開當代有關海洋符號學以及地緣政治學的學術理解,這種扁平化的海洋想像亦會引伸出一套「土地規劃」視覺,將海洋像陸地領土一樣切割、分配及加工建設,人為置入式改造海洋。最近的龍尾「海膽黑沙灘」為例,正好凸顯這種「暴力」人工改海的潛在災難,忽視吐露港一帶的水質評估、海灘選址的海水對流動向、以及鄰近具生態價值的海洋生物等等以海洋為整體的規劃考量。
海洋既非空無一物,那我們應如何定義海洋?作者認為,海洋除了充滿各樣的生物,作為一個流動的世界,地方(place)永遠正在形成,更是一個權力關係投射、通過及圍繞的空間(a world of fluidities where place is forever in formation and where power is simultaneously projected on, through, in, and about space)。可見,陸地平面的、可理解的、有確立邊界的特性幾乎與海洋完全相反。海洋為本的思考除了海洋本質上跟陸地不同,亦會影響如何認知海洋中的物質與非物質互動。相信以此作為出發點,我們才能找尋與陸上視覺以外海洋規劃新出路。
要理解何謂流動(fluidity)的海洋,除了要閱讀今次推薦文章外,亦推薦透過呈現海洋生態的紀錄片,作為理解海洋流動且多變的特質的方法,除了講述正在消失的粉紅色「魚頭」的紀錄片《白海豚失樂園》(Breathing Room)外,近日最新一套關於香港海洋聲音的《聲之海Sea of noise》,亦呈現香港海洋作為一個不斷有各種不同聲音流動混雜的空間。
紀錄片中呈現,聲音在海洋裏傳播的速度為在陸地上的五倍,傳播的距離也比在陸地上遠得多。原來對於倚靠聲音作溝通媒介的海洋生物而言,海洋工程的影響下,置身海洋中就如長期在工地裏生活,噪音大大影響牠們探索環境、與同伴溝通、甚至覓食。再反思香港近年在海上的基建,為補償三跑工程對白海豚生境作出的破壞而設立的大小磨刀洲海岸公園,竟選址在三跑項目旁邊,該海城一直受高速船影響,鄰近又不斷有工程進行,成立這個名義上的海岸公園,其成效不足可想而知,嘗試滿足的,可能只是反對三跑的民意。
放眼未來,不斷上馬的大型填海項目明日大嶼、海洋旅遊化等海洋產業,以規劃土地的眼光去規劃海洋,除了對環境做成不可彌補的破壞,更甚進一步收窄我們對於海洋的豐富想像。因而,要尋求現時香港海洋規劃的新出路,第一步先要理解陸地與海洋的巨大差異:海洋既沒有如陸地般有意義的邊界,亦是個擁有不同流動性與特質的空間。輕率將陸地城市發展的思維貿然在放在海中心,或許會出現「蝴蝶效應」,招致意想像不到的災難。
#圖片由研究員Kristy提供
#研究員潛水訓身演出
#bewatermyfriend
#海洋規劃新出路
#研究閱讀
Reference
Steinberg, P., & Peters, K. (2015). Wet Ontologies, Fluid Spaces: Giving Depth to Volume through Oceanic Thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(2), 247–264.
💪 研究自主 月捐撐起最新專研系列:
https://liber-research.com/support-us/
🔸FPS ID:5390547
🔸HSBC PayMe 捐款支持:https://bit.ly/32aoOMn
🔸戶口號碼:匯豐銀行 640-198305-001 (LIBER RESEARCH COMMUNITY (HK) COMPANY LIMITED)
👨👩👧👦義工招募:https://bit.ly/2SbbyT3
同時也有15部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過22萬的網紅香港花生,也在其Youtube影片中提到,主持:馬戩佑(Duncan)、Janice FB專頁:雙腦筋 ādi IG:doublebrain_adi 實驗論文:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789337/ 結論: //Results support our hypothesi...
「environment research」的推薦目錄:
- 關於environment research 在 本土研究社 Liber Research Community Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於environment research 在 本土研究社 Liber Research Community Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於environment research 在 貓的成長美股異想世界 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於environment research 在 香港花生 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於environment research 在 Wes Davies 衛斯理 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於environment research 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最佳貼文
environment research 在 本土研究社 Liber Research Community Facebook 的最讚貼文
【早期郊野公園規劃:禁止「破壞邊洲」觀景台】
政府主導嘅「周遊六角」山徑設計比賽結果近日出爐,「破邊洲觀景台」嘅設計概念非常震撼,但都不及對香港地質公園嘅景觀保育(landscape conservation)嘅潛在衝擊大。呢啲係自然景觀上突出嘅龐然人造巨物,象徵住以往郊野公園設施嘅低調、不經不覺融入自然嘅設計概念已逝,取而代之嘅係一個又一個吸引人流、有意無意地提供視覺震撼嘅「打卡熱點」。
回顧1970-80年代郊野公園初期規劃文件,呢類具視覺侵略性(visually intrusive)嘅設施,根本唔可以係破邊洲旁邊出現。何況今日破邊洲一帶已貴為世界地質公園(Global GeoPark),若果持續搞呢啲打卡設施帶來景觀破壞,會否為動搖其地質公園地位屬未知之數。
▌破邊洲規劃:禁止視覺災難康樂設施
本土研究社早前透過《公開資料守則》,獲得一份西貢郊野公園嘅「發展限制圖則」(Development Control Plan)【註1】,發現破邊洲附近嘅花山一帶,即係現在「破壞邊洲」觀景台所在嘅位置,係屬於「發展限制第二區」(Development Control Zone Category II),該區特別註明其發展限制:除了「低視覺影響康樂設施」外,一概不准任何發展(No development except certain low visual impact recreational facilities)。
毋庸置疑,現在「周遊六角」各得獎作品均有頗高嘅視覺衝擊,未知漁護署喺比賽前有否告知各參賽隊伍該區原有嘅政策限制。若無,作為始作俑者嘅政府,係咪應該交代呢啲保護景觀嘅守則係咪已經無人理。
▌當年「發展限制第二區」有多嚴格?
有關郊野公園內發展限制(Development Control)政策嘅公開資料極少,咁「發展限制第二區」執行上係有多嚴格?可考據嘅案例不多,暫時唯一可考嘅係1970年代末期由前港督麥理浩「揭發」嘅西貢郊野公園內嘅視覺污染事件。
事發地點同樣喺西貢、所在位置亦是「發展限制第二區」,最後該小型違規發展亦須拆除,可見郊野公園初期對於景觀維護極為重視。
參考一份解密政府歷史檔案【註2】,1978年,麥理浩巡視西貢黃石碼頭時發現近深灣岸邊(即高流灣附近海灣)有一經營魚排嘅漁民所搭建未經申請嘅小型建築物,要求立即跟進。
當年漁農署調查後,對照發展限制圖則所在區域(同樣係「發展限制第二區」),認為即使那只是一個小小的避風處(Shelter),但已經造成視覺污染(polluting visually),而且直接與郊野公園及其引人入勝嘅環境衝突(conflicting with the adjacent Country Park and the generally attractive surrounding environment)、亦同長遠附近嘅康樂規劃不協調,最後需要整個建構物拆卸。可見在當年謹慎嘅規劃下,一座小小嘅建構物係自然環境中都不被接受,亦有將郊野公園長遠規劃嘅視野放入每項小型發展嘅考慮當中。
▌「發展限制圖則」被丢入垃圾桶?
「破壞邊洲」觀景台所帶來嘅視覺衝擊明顯比當年西貢岸邊嘅小小建構物更大,為公眾觀賞地質奇觀而興建龐然人造巨物,倒過頭來破壞景觀,整件事極為諷刺。不少郊野公園用家、關心呢啲自然遺產嘅朋友對「破壞邊洲」觀景台劣評如潮。
值得注意嘅係,呢個觀景台設計比賽之所以能夠出現,係咪代表「發展限制圖則」已經畀漁護署丢入垃圾桶?咁現時郊野公園內嘅發展限制係如何執行?如果無晒呢啲內部準則,日後一項項駭人聽聞嘅 #搞郊旅遊 設施,將會不斷湧現。
#搞乜郊野
#破邊洲
#打卡熱點
【註1】Development Control Plan, Sai Kung Country Parks
透過《公開資料守則獲得》,確實訂立年份不詳,大約是1970-80年代。
《發展限制圖則》將每個郊野公園分為六區
第一區: 不准任何形式發展
(Category I: No development allowed );
第二區:不准任何低視覺影響康樂設施以外的發展
(Category II: No development except certain low visual impact recreational facilities);
第三區:准許發展分散發展小型非形式化公眾康樂設施
(Category III: Development would be restricted to small scale dispersed facilities serving or
enhancing informal public recreation);
第四區:准許分散發展大型非形式化公眾康樂設施
(Category IV: Development of dispersed large scale informal public recreation facilities may be acceptable in certain locations);
第五區:任何形式並符合鄉郊環境的康樂設施(Category V: Any recreational development compatible with a rural setting Category VI);
第六區:任何形式並符合鄉郊環境的發展
(Any development compatible with a rural setting)
郊野公園絕大部分範圍均屬於第一區至第四區,第五區、第六區多位於郊野公園邊界外。
【註2】香港歷史檔案館館藏 HKRS1708-1-3 CONSERVATION OF NATURE – CONTROLS OF DEVELOPMENT INSIDE SAI KUNG COUNTRY PARKS – INCLUDING MARICULTURE AT SHAM WAN LONG HARBOUR
-
研究有價 月捐撐起土地研究工作:https://liber-research.com/support-us/
FPS ID:5390547
HSBC PayMe 捐款支持:https://bit.ly/32aoOMn
戶口號碼:匯豐銀行 640-198305-001 (LIBER RESEARCH COMMUNITY (HK) COMPANY LIMITED)
義工招募:https://bit.ly/2SbbyT3
environment research 在 貓的成長美股異想世界 Facebook 的最佳貼文
🌻Docusign(DOCU), Crowdstrike(CRWD)財報結果
上週這兩家公司發表財報了.
這兩天看了一下他們的財報結果. Again, 兩家的表現都很好, 但發現分析師給DOCU的調價(往上)幅度比較多, 就好奇研究了一下SaaS公司是怎麼被估值的. 有興趣的話可以看看(從中學習到很多. 非常推薦一讀):
https://makingsenseofusastocks.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html
(By the way, 分析師對CRWD的價格調幅沒那麼大, 主因是成長趨緩了. 而DOCU的free cash flow佔營收比, 以及顧客黏著力在這季創了新高, 是讓分析師按讚的幾個原因).
關於CRWD: "The Street is already modeling revenue growth deceleration in 2022 to 36%, down from 60% expected in 2021, which on its own might prove a hurdle for a stock already trading at a high multiple," said Bank of America analyst Tal Liani in a report.
分析師對於DOCU的評價:
• 11位buy; 給的價格分別是: $310, $320 (x2), $330 (x2), $340 (x2), $345, $350, $350, $389
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst continues to view them as a best in class way to play digital transformation trends with strong growth, cash flow and profitability, and a strong competitive position. Power said DocuSign remains one of his top long-term compounding growth ideas.
o Citi: While slightly shy of the double-digit billings beat in recent quarters, DocuSign still delivered a solid 8% beat to Q2 billings, which grew 47% year-over-year, Radke tells investors in a research note.
o Evercore ISI: he calls "another strong quarter." While some may have wanted to see more aggressive Q3 billings guidance, he believes estimates "continue to leave room for upside," Materne said.
o JMP Securities: While revenue growth decelerated to 50% from 58% in Q1, the company is the clear leader in electronic signature and the broader system of agreement having crossed over 1M customers with a $2B run rate this quarter, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that he sees lots of room for growth as DocuSign targets a $50B total addressable market.
o Needham: The analyst commented, "Docusign reported another strong quarter in 2QF22 with typical DOCU upside to revenue and profitability. Sales metrics and growth decelerated Q/Q, as we expected against a massive pandemic quarter, but at a much slower rate than we believe much of the Street was anticipating. 65k net new customers was lower than the 70k - 90 range of CY20 but was still more than 2x greater than any pre-pandemic quarter, highlighting a strong end-market driving 47% billings growth against a strong comp. Commentary on incremental Agreement Cloud demand was positive, suggesting an additional growth tailwind combined with solid international can further aid 2HF22. Although DOCU shares could be lower near-term due to weak 2H OpMg guidance, we think this guidance is conservative, as the recent OM was greater than the pre-pandemic level even with tough comps."
o RBC Capital: The quarter highlighted the sustainability of the company's tailwinds post-pandemic as most of its underlying metrics such as billings and net revenue retention were solid, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that the traction with CLM and Notary was also "impressive".
分析師對於CRWD的評價:
• 12位buy; 給的價格分別是: $300, $310 (x2), $313, $315 (x2) , $305, $320, $325, $330 (x2), $340
• 1位給hold: $280 (from $220 by J.P. Morgan(same))
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst believes the company has significant room for growth with core modules, opportunities with Humio and in cloud workload security, among others, should help drive a continuation of strong growth over a long time horizon.
o BTIG: The company's "strong" Q2 results "cleared every hurdle", even though the buy-side benchmarks may have been slightly higher, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Powell adds that Crowdstrike is clearly gaining share in its core endpoint security target market at a rapid pace and gaining traction with new products across multiple categories.
o Canaccord: The analyst said the stock is down from its recent highs, and he thinks the re-rating creates a more favorable entry point for longer-oriented investors for a foundational security name. He views Crowdstrike as a long-term secular winner in security due to its native cloud platform advantage versus closely held peers in endpoint security combined with platform expansion into tangential segments to capture greater share of security budgets.
o Goldman Sachs: CrowdStrike last night delivered "another beat and raise quarter as the company benefited from another quarter of elevated demand," Essex said. But it traded lower following net new annual recurring revenue growth guidance that was slightly less than investors had hoped for. Essex, nonetheless, said the quarter demonstrated CrowdStrike's "ability to continue to go down market efficiently."
o JMP Securities: The analyst notes the company's Q2 annualized recurring revenue of $1.34B topping his estimate of $1.30B, with "sustained" 70% ARR and revenue growth along with margin upside seen as key highlights for the quarter. Suppiger adds that the metrics reflect Crowdstrike's "strong execution and robust demand environment".
o Mizuho: "very good" fiscal Q2 results. The annual recurring revenue growth of 70% year-over-year "was strong and still nicely surpassed" the Street's 65%-66% estimate, Moskowitz tells investors in a research note. He believes "strong execution can propel" Crowdstrike's stock higher.
o Piper Sandler: The company's metrics "outperformed across the board" in Q2 with 70% annual recurring revenue and revenue growth and record net new customer adds in the quarter, Owens tells investors in a research note.
o RBC Capital: Hedberg adds that CrowdStrike's record pipeline entering Q3 should continue to fuel the company's "land-and-expand" momentum.
o Stifel: Q2 results that he said "exceeded consensus estimates across all major financial metrics." He continues to believe that Crowdstrike's growth opportunity "remains in the early days" despite the company's scale given continued share capture within its core endpoint security market and incremental module adoption on the Falcon Platform, Reback tells investors.
o UBS: the company reported "pretty good" Q2 results against high expectations.
🌻趨勢: 跨境電商 Cross-border commerce
Morgan Stanley:
From our perspective, we think many are underestimating what the cross-border eCommerce demand could ultimately be, once key friction points like FX rates, tax and duties, shipping, language, etc are smoothed—all issues that Global-E directly addresses.
Cross-border ecommerce brings new, high-yield volume: We think elevated levels of cross-border ecommerce (ex-travel) is a structural shift thathas yet to be fully contemplated in MA (and V)'s long-term forecasts. MA's cross-border CNP ex-travel volume was 69% above 2019's level in 2Q and 63% higher in 1Q. Strength reflects both broader ecommerce adoption plus globalization of commerce, as marketplaces and services that reduce cross-border friction (such as those from GLBE) make international online ordering more readily adopted. Early data at V suggests greater cross-border ecommerce spend is persisting even in areas with pre-pandemic levels of international travel. Cross-border transactions also come at a higher yield, making us more optimistic that the trend can bring incremental long-term growth to the networks.
產業的潮流是有連貫性的. 疫情讓電商更發達後, 接下來應該就是加速電商跨境了. 跨境的話, 有很多問題需要解決(稅率, 語言, etc.) 這就需要有公司來做整合的動作. 這種跨境, 也可以想像是omnichannel的一種呈現.
Harley Finkelstein (President of Shopify): "I mean I think commerce in 2021 is cross-border."
🌻SPAC熱潮退卻,初創市值蒸發750億美元
"SPAC熱潮已經退卻。分析顯示,在2月中旬以前完成合併的137家SPAC的總市值已經蒸發25%,市值回落幅度上個月一度超過1,000億美元。"
"像貝萊德(BlackRock Inc., BLK)和富達投資(Fidelity Investments Inc.)這類企業管理的基金,以及許多對沖基金、養老金管理公司和其他一些投資者,都在SPAC的回落中遭受了衝擊,他們在去年年底開始的熱潮中競相投資SPAC。其中許多基金由於在價格還很低的時候就早早入場,所以現在仍坐擁可觀收益。事實上,SPAC市值仍有約2,500億美元,高於一年前的約1,000億美元,反映出這期間股價上漲和新公司上市的影響。
但即便如此,今年年初令人炫目的回報還是讓許多後來者做了接盤俠,扎堆投資所謂穩賺不賠的領域,其永恆的風險可見一斑。在過去的幾個月裡,一些投資者眼睜睜看著帳面財富縮水。"
"股價下跌會在SPAC領域形成惡性循環,因為投資者有權在併購交易前從空白支票公司撤資。一旦SPAC跌破發行價,投資者就更有可能這樣做,而許多SPAC的股價現在正處於這樣的水平。目前,在尚未宣布併購交易的空白支票公司中,超過95%的公司股價低於發行價。
投資者的大規模撤資會讓已經上市的空白支票公司手上的現金大幅減少,讓其更難實現業務目標,並可能加劇股價跌勢。"
https://on.wsj.com/3n6JznC
🌻BNPL (buy now pay later)
But most BNPL providers including Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay have been losing money despite breakneck revenue growth as they invest heavily in marketing to win share. Sweden-based Klarna’s credit losses more than doubled in the second quarter. Affirm has projected adjusted operating losses of $50m-$55m for the fiscal year that ended June 30.
The path to profitability for many of these companies was to achieve massive scale, analysts said.
https://www.ft.com/content/ca201a37-a16d-4223-b123-04d38350a972
Pictures: 一葉知秋; from EarningsWhispers
environment research 在 香港花生 Youtube 的精選貼文
主持:馬戩佑(Duncan)、Janice
FB專頁:雙腦筋 ādi
IG:doublebrain_adi
實驗論文:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789337/
結論:
//Results support our hypothesis that initial encoding context (whether negative or neutral) can influence later memory for incidental stimuli (the foils). In the framework of our research question, emotional events from the past can taint our perception of the present, making current circumstances more memorable. When we constrain our memory search to information or events encountered within a negative context, or learnt using a negative mode of processing, some memory benefit held by those thoughts may be conferred unto incidental stimuli within our current environment. Of note, this downstream memory bias was significant only in individuals with high levels of trait anxiety. Our findings suggest that anxiety can engender a mode of cognitive processing that taints or colours otherwise neutral information.//
FPS 轉數快: 94681803
Patreon賬戶:https://www.patreon.com/hkpeanut
HONG KONG INTERNET RADIO LIMITED
支票/銀行過數
轉賬至滙豐銀行 023-280233-838,抬頭 HONG KONG INTERNET RADIO LIMITED
花生網頁: www.hkpeanuts.com
PayPal 付款賬號: hkangrypeanut@gmail.com
FB專頁: https://www.facebook.com/hkpeanuts/
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2aaef/2aaef4abd6175e1de379ea3a8376623de69db387" alt="post-title"
environment research 在 Wes Davies 衛斯理 Youtube 的精選貼文
#衛斯理農業之美系列
EP 1 不塑之客:不可思議的農業新技術 🌿https://youtu.be/8FpNvM9Y08g
EP2 最先進的臺灣茶業技術!科學革命帶來的全新品茶體驗!🍵https://youtu.be/5I8JQWve5ls
EP3 百花齊放:新台灣之光🌺https://youtu.be/x7SEkvxzdSA
EP4 牧場大變身:智慧鮮乳 🐮https://youtu.be/C_b9rVNJieA
*MODERN DAY MILK FARMING IN TAIWAN USING INTELLIGENT AUTOMATED TECHNOLOGIES*
【探訪農業科專-系列4 牧場大變身:優質鮮乳怎麼來?】
臺灣的最高學府「臺灣大學」裡面有一座不可思議的現代化牧場,這裡或許產出了臺灣最聰明的鮮奶,畢竟他們是由一群頂尖研究人員精心照料的,在這裡我看到了這些 #農業工程師 運用不可思議的#智慧化管理,讓乳牛能維持在最舒適的環境,產出高品質的鮮奶。
這些研究成果不僅僅講這座實驗牧場,同時也與企業合作,在#苗栗四方鮮乳牧場,我們就看到了傳統牧場經過智慧化管理,所取得的卓越成效。牧場管理有更佳的效率、乳牛們更快樂、民眾也可以享受到更高品質的鮮乳!
【Visiting AGTECH Program -Series 4 farming transformation: How does high-quality fresh milk come about?】
There is this incredible modern ranch in Taiwan’s best university “NTU.” The smartest produced fresh milk in Taiwan is being made here. After all, they are carefully taken care of by a group of top researchers. Here I saw these #農業工程師 using unbelievable #智慧化管理 that allows dairy cows to be in their most comfortable environment to produce high-quality fresh milk.
These research results not only influence this experimental ranch, but also helps other milk farms. In # Miaoli Fourways Professional Ranch, we have seen the remarkable results achieved by traditional ranch through intelligent management. Farming can achieve better efficiency, dairy cows are happier, people could also enjoy higher quality fresh milk!
本影片為行政院農業委員會AgTech農業科技專案計畫合作影片,更多資訊內容請看:
『AgTech 農業科技專案計畫服務網』計畫網站
►►https://agtech.coa.gov.tw/
『AgTech農業科技專案計畫』YouTube頻道 ►►https://www.youtube.com/user/doitTaiwan
『AgTech農業科技專案計畫』粉絲專頁讚起來 ►►https://www.facebook.com/AGTECH2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8063a/8063add630cffcfc22429eaf4cd3f6d2cc8beffe" alt="post-title"
environment research 在 Ghost Island Media 鬼島之音 Youtube 的最佳貼文
You’ve heard about this. Bees are dying. And we’re gonna go down with them. But maybe you haven’t heard that life in the ocean is just as crucial for human survival as those on land.
This episode, Nature N8 speaks with Dr. Enric Sala about his new book: The Nature of Nature - Why We Need the Wild, which lays out precisely how we are integrated in this planet’s wondrous and irreplaceable ecosystem. Dr. Enric Sala was a professor at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography, now working full time in conservation as a National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence. The Nature of Nature synthesizes his decades of research on ecology, and provides an accessible introduction to people who want to learn more about the natural world.
In their conversation, N8 and Dr. Sala talk about hope in marine protected areas, swimming with sharks in California, and the marvelous message of the Church of Plankton.
Support us on Patreon:
http://patreon.com/wastenotwhynot
Subscribe to our newsletter:
https://wastenotwhynot.substack.com/
Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/wastenotpod
Send your questions to:
ask@wastenotwhynot.com
SHOW CREDIT
Emily Y. Wu (Executive Producer)
https://twitter.com/emilyywu
Nate Maynard (Producer, Host)
https://twitter.com/N8MAY
Yu-Chen Lai (Producer, Editor)
https://twitter.com/aGuavaEmoji
Ghost Island Media (Production Company)
https://twitter.com/ghostislandme
www.ghostisland.media
MB01SB0RO64J6RD
#WasteNotWhyNot #Conservation #Environment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dfb5/6dfb507c8d2afddd01f433e0a96f94b240f55cc6" alt="post-title"
environment research 在 International Journal of Environmental Research and ... - MDPI 的相關結果
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal. ... <看更多>
environment research 在 Environmental Research Latest Journal's Impact IF - Trend 的相關結果
Environmental Research is a peer-reviewed environmental science and environmental health journal published by Elsevier. The editor in chief is Jose L. Domingo. ... <看更多>
environment research 在 Environmental Research | Journal - ScienceDirect.com 的相關結果
Environmental Research is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing high quality and novel information about anthropogenic issues of global relevance and ... ... <看更多>