關於 hakka language ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#和女兒第一次看金曲獎
#金曲獎的獎項英文怎麼說
上禮拜六大家有追金曲獎嗎？
有些人會覺得記獎項的英文好像很冷門，平常沒事又不會講。
但我認為是更認識一個單字的方法喔！
比如說「最佳新人獎」，英文是什麼？
來！你心裡是不是會想說 New…什麼 Award有沒有！
然後就卡在「人」不知道要用什麼字 🤭

最佳新人獎是Best New Artist。
我們課本裡學的 artist 感覺就是要畫畫的那種藝術家，
但其實artist 的定義是 a person who creates art (such as painting, sculpture, music, or writing) with great skill and creative imagination
所以其實只要有「創作」，就可以是廣義的藝術範疇，也都可以稱為 artist喔！例如彩妝師叫make-up artist，film artist是電影藝術家。

以下是完整得獎名單，看看有沒有你感興趣的字喔！
考考：「年度最佳歌曲」英文怎麼說？請留言！

Album of the Year: Gain Strength (得力量)
Best Mandarin Album: Home Cookin' (家常音樂) (Soft Lipa, 杜振熙)
Best Female Singer (Mandarin): Hebe Tien (田馥甄)
Best Male Singer (Mandarin): Soft Lipa 杜振熙
Song of the Year: Your Name Engraved Herein (刻在我心底的名字) (Crowd Lu, 盧廣仲)
Best Album Producer: George Chen (陳建騏) (Time Will Tell, 無人知曉)
Best Song Producer: Khalil Fong (方大同)
Special Contribution Award: TaYou Lo (羅大佑)
Best Composer: HUSH
Best Instrumental Composer: Terry Hsieh (謝燕輝) Derrick Sepnio (張德銘) (Bitter Sweet, 苦樂)
Best Vocal Album Recording: Where Is SHI? (出沒地帶)
Best Instrumental Album: The Adventures of Pie Boy (派仔之遊)
Best Instrumental Album Producer: Hirsk
Best Instrumental Album Recording: The Adventures of Pie Boy (派仔之遊)
Best Hakka Album: Till (到底)
Best Singer (Hakka): Wing Lo (羅文裕)
Best Music Video: Home Cookin' (家常音樂) (Cowper Wang, 王宗欣)
Best Album Design: Qing-yang Xiao (蕭青陽) (ZETA)
Best Vocal Group: The Wanted (尋人啟事)
Best Band: Sunset Rollercoaster (落日飛車)
Best Taiwanese Album: Tsu-pun (自本) (Olivia Tsao, 曹雅雯)
Best Female Singer (Taiwanese): Olivia Tsao (曹雅雯)
Best Male Singer (Taiwanese): Hsu FuKai (許富凱)
Best New Artist: Whyte, aka ?te (壞特)
Best Indigenous Language Album: Lady of the Ocean (海女)
Best Singer (Indigenous language): SANGPUY (桑布伊)
Best Arranger: Baby Chung (鍾興民)
Best Lyricist 最佳作曲人獎: David Ke (葛大為)

咦？闊樂集又要發新作品了嗎？
是的！繼客語歌與台語歌之後，闊樂集的下一首新歌曲將會是什麼語言呢？在留言區裡猜猜看吧～👩‍🚒
請鎖定YouTube：闊樂集BroadBand
.
What’s that? BroadBand is coming out with another song?
That’s right! After doing a song in Hakka and a song in Taiwanese, what language may be next? Put your guess in the comments〜🧑🏼‍🚒
Subscribe to our YouTube: 闊樂集BroadBand
.
.
.
#BroadBand #Vocalband #streetphotography #街拍 #攝影 #菜市場 #預告 #闊樂集 #墨鏡 #傳統文化 #阿卡貝拉

Jenna Cody :

Is Taiwan a real China?
No, and with the exception of a few intervening decades - here’s the part that’ll surprise you - it never has been.

This’ll blow your mind too: that it never has been doesn’t matter.

So let’s start with what doesn’t actually matter.

Until the 1600s, Taiwan was indigenous. Indigenous Taiwanese are not Chinese, they’re Austronesian. Then it was a Dutch colony (note: I do not say “it was Dutch”, I say it was a Dutch colony). Then it was taken over by Ming loyalists at the end of the Ming dynasty (the Ming loyalists were breakaways, not a part of the new Qing court. Any overlap in Ming rule and Ming loyalist conquest of Taiwan was so brief as to be inconsequential).

Only then, in the late 1600s, was it taken over by the Chinese (Qing). But here’s the thing, it was more like a colony of the Qing, treated as - to use Emma Teng’s wording in Taiwan’s Imagined Geography - a barrier or barricade keeping the ‘real’ Qing China safe. In fact, the Qing didn’t even want Taiwan at first, the emperor called it “a ball of mud beyond the pale of civilization”. Prior to that, and to a great extent at that time, there was no concept on the part of China that Taiwan was Chinese, even though Chinese immigrants began moving to Taiwan under Dutch colonial rule (mostly encouraged by the Dutch, to work as laborers). When the Spanish landed in the north of Taiwan, it was the Dutch, not the Chinese, who kicked them out.

Under Qing colonial rule - and yes, I am choosing my words carefully - China only controlled the Western half of Taiwan. They didn’t even have maps for the eastern half. That’s how uninterested in it they were. I can’t say that the Qing controlled “Taiwan”, they only had power over part of it.

Note that the Qing were Manchu, which at the time of their conquest had not been a part of China: China itself essentially became a Manchu imperial holding, and Taiwan did as well, once they were convinced it was not a “ball of mud” but actually worth taking. Taiwan was not treated the same way as the rest of “Qing China”, and was not administered as a province until (I believe) 1887. So that’s around 200 years of Taiwan being a colony of the Qing.

What happened in the late 19th century to change China’s mind? Japan. A Japanese ship was shipwrecked in eastern Taiwan in the 1870s, and the crew was killed by hostile indigenous people in what is known as the Mudan Incident. A Japanese emissary mission went to China to inquire about what could be done, only to be told that China had no control there and if they went to eastern Taiwan, they did so at their own peril. China had not intended to imply that Taiwan wasn’t theirs, but they did. Japan - and other foreign powers, as France also attempted an invasion - were showing an interest in Taiwan, so China decided to cement its claim, started mapping the entire island, and made it a province.

So, I suppose for a decade or so Taiwan was a part of China. A China that no longer exists.

It remained a province until 1895, when it was ceded to Japan after the (first) Sino-Japanese War. Before that could happen, Taiwan declared itself a Republic, although it was essentially a Qing puppet state (though the history here is interesting - correspondence at the time indicates that the leaders of this ‘Republic of Taiwan’ considered themselves Chinese, and the tiger flag hints at this as well. However, the constitution was a very republican document, not something you’d expect to see in Qing-era China.) That lasted for less than a year, when the Japanese took it by force.

This is important for two reasons - the first is that some interpretations of IR theory state that when a colonial holding is released, it should revert to the state it was in before it was taken as a colony. In this case, that would actually be The Republic of Taiwan, not Qing-era China. Secondly, it puts to rest all notions that there was no Taiwan autonomy movement prior to 1947.

In any case, it would be impossible to revert to its previous state, as the government that controlled it - the Qing empire - no longer exists. The current government of China - the PRC - has never controlled it.

After the Japanese colonial era, there is a whole web of treaties and agreements that do not satisfactorily settle the status of Taiwan. None of them actually do so - those which explicitly state that Taiwan is to be given to the Republic of China (such as the Cairo declaration) are non-binding. Those that are binding do not settle the status of Taiwan (neither the treaty of San Francisco nor the Treaty of Taipei definitively say that Taiwan is a part of China, or even which China it is - the Treaty of Taipei sets out what nationality the Taiwanese are to be considered, but that doesn’t determine territorial claims). Treaty-wise, the status of Taiwan is “undetermined”.

Under more modern interpretations, what a state needs to be a state is…lessee…a contiguous territory, a government, a military, a currency…maybe I’m forgetting something, but Taiwan has all of it. For all intents and purposes it is independent already.

In fact, in the time when all of these agreements were made, the Allied powers weren’t as sure as you might have learned about what to do with Taiwan. They weren’t a big fan of Chiang Kai-shek, didn’t want it to go Communist, and discussed an Allied trusteeship (which would have led to independence) or backing local autonomy movements (which did exist). That it became what it did - “the ROC” but not China - was an accident (as Hsiao-ting Lin lays out in Accidental State).

In fact, the KMT knew this, and at the time the foreign minister (George Yeh) stated something to the effect that they were aware they were ‘squatters’ in Taiwan.

Since then, it’s true that the ROC claims to be the rightful government of Taiwan, however, that hardly matters when considering the future of Taiwan simply because they have no choice. To divest themselves of all such claims (and, presumably, change their name) would be considered by the PRC to be a declaration of formal independence. So that they have not done so is not a sign that they wish to retain the claim, merely that they wish to avoid a war.

It’s also true that most Taiwanese are ethnically “Han” (alongside indigenous and Hakka, although Hakka are, according to many, technically Han…but I don’t think that’s relevant here). But biology is not destiny: what ethnicity someone is shouldn’t determine what government they must be ruled by.

Through all of this, the Taiwanese have evolved their own culture, identity and sense of history. They are diverse in a way unique to Taiwan, having been a part of Austronesian and later Hoklo trade routes through Southeast Asia for millenia. Now, one in five (I’ve heard one in four, actually) Taiwanese children has a foreign parent. The Taiwanese language (which is not Mandarin - that’s a KMT transplant language forced on Taiwanese) is gaining popularity as people discover their history. Visiting Taiwan and China, it is clear where the cultural differences are, not least in terms of civic engagement. This morning, a group of legislators were removed after a weekend-long pro-labor hunger strike in front of the presidential palace. They were not arrested and will not be. Right now, a group of pro-labor protesters is lying down on the tracks at Taipei Main Station to protest the new labor law amendments.

This would never be allowed in China, but Taiwanese take it as a fiercely-guarded basic right.

*

Now, as I said, none of this matters.

What matters is self-determination. If you believe in democracy, you believe that every state (and Taiwan does fit the definition of a state) that wants to be democratic - that already is democratic and wishes to remain that way - has the right to self-determination. In fact, every nation does. You cannot be pro-democracy and also believe that it is acceptable to deprive people of this right, especially if they already have it.

Taiwan is already a democracy. That means it has the right to determine its own future. Period.

Even under the ROC, Taiwan was not allowed to determine its future. The KMT just arrived from China and claimed it. The Taiwanese were never asked if they consented. What do we call it when a foreign government arrives in land they had not previously governed and declares itself the legitimate governing power of that land without the consent of the local people? We call that colonialism.

Under this definition, the ROC can also be said to be a colonial power in Taiwan. They forced Mandarin - previously not a language native to Taiwan - onto the people, taught Chinese history, geography and culture, and insisted that the Taiwanese learn they were Chinese - not Taiwanese (and certainly not Japanese). This was forced on them. It was not chosen. Some, for awhile, swallowed it. Many didn’t. The independence movement only grew, and truly blossomed after democratization - something the Taiwanese fought for and won, not something handed to them by the KMT.

So what matters is what the Taiwanese want, not what the ROC is forced to claim. I cannot stress this enough - if you do not believe Taiwan has the right to this, you do not believe in democracy.

And poll after poll shows it: Taiwanese identify more as Taiwanese than Chinese (those who identify as both primarily identify as Taiwanese, just as I identify as American and Armenian, but primarily as American. Armenian is merely my ethnicity). They overwhelmingly support not unifying with China. The vast majority who support the status quo support one that leads to eventual de jure independence, not unification. The status quo is not - and cannot be - an endgame (if only because China has declared so, but also because it is untenable). Less than 10% want unification. Only a small number (a very small minority) would countenance unification in the future…even if China were to democratize.

The issue isn’t the incompatibility of the systems - it’s that the Taiwanese fundamentally do not see themselves as Chinese.

A change in China’s system won’t change that. It’s not an ethnic nationalism - there is no ethnic argument for Taiwan (or any nation - didn’t we learn in the 20th century what ethnicity-based nation-building leads to? Nothing good). It’s not a jingoistic or xenophobic nationalism - Taiwanese know that to be dangerous. It’s a nationalism based on shared identity, culture, history and civics. The healthiest kind of nationalism there is. Taiwan exists because the Taiwanese identify with it. Period.

There are debates about how long the status quo should go on, and what we should risk to insist on formal recognition. However, the question of whether or not to be Taiwan, not China…

…well, that’s already settled.

The Taiwanese have spoken and they are not Chinese.

Whatever y’all think about that doesn’t matter. That’s what they want, and if you believe in self-determination you will respect it.

If you don’t, good luck with your authoritarian nonsense, but Taiwan wants nothing to do with it.

9.24 於公廣金鐘入圍茶會演唱


🔸 中文字幕高畫質版：https://youtu.be/sur9pugrjVM
🔹英文字幕高畫質版：https://youtu.be/GyAPQEhBp7U



無垢鳥 (改編自客語童謠〈阿啾箭〉)
White Drongo ( Adapted from a Hakka nursery rhyme "Black Drongo" )

作詞改編：徐麗雯 Sub Author : Herb Hsu
作曲改編：蔣韜 Sub Composer : Jiang Tao
演唱：邱舒 Performer : Shu Chiu

文/徐麗雯 By Herb Hsu

〈無垢鳥〉的歌詞係由《維摩詰所說經·方便品》以及客語童謠〈阿啾箭〉所發想而成。
The lyrics are inspired by “The Vimalakirti Sutra” and the Hakka nursery rhyme “Black Drongo”.

阿啾箭為大卷尾的客語稱法，是地域性很強的鳥類，昔常見於農村牛背上；維摩的梵語是清淨、無垢的意思，結合以上二者，故曲名題為〈無垢鳥〉。
A black drongo is a highly territorial bird often seen resting on the back of a cow in the countryside. “Vima” in Sanskrit language means clean and pure, which is why the song is named “White Drongo”.

〈阿啾箭〉這首童謠使用在電影《光的孩子》的劇情關鍵處，藉由不同角色的無伴奏哼唱，前後串連出生命、情感的一脈相承。〈阿啾箭〉的童謠歌詞迴環反覆、直白簡要，指出無父無母的處境、追尋的失落，剛好扣合電影的角色際遇，也與《維摩詰所說經·方便品》的核心精神相呼應。
The Hakka nursery rhyme “Black Drongo” is used in an important part of the film “The Child of Light”. Hummed by different characters without the accompaniment, it expresses how our lives and feelings are interrelated. With the rotatory and straight forward lyrics, we know how it feels when you’ve lost your parents and try to find something but in vain, which is what the protagonist of the film has been through and in accordance with the core of “The Vimalakirti Sutra”.

〈無垢鳥〉歌詞以聚沫、泡、燄、幻、夢、影、浮雲、電等喻，示明無常的諦理；而〈阿啾箭〉童謠則提供了一個生活感的基底；兩者一虛一實，精神層面和現實景況交匯共振，成為了普世無盡的扣問。
A cluster of foam, a bubble, a flame, an illusion, a dream, a shadow, a cloud and lightning in the lyrics show us how transitory life is while the nursery rhyme “Black Drongo” itself describes an ordinary daily routine. The former is unreal while the later is real. When the spirituality meets the reality, endless questions arise ubiquitously.

〈無垢鳥〉是電影《光的孩子》的片尾曲。原初的構想是希望片尾曲能有不斷往前、往前，最後隨風消散的感覺，意圖在影片結束時，以對自然的感知、經文的無常空相，延擴至更超然的識界，並帶給人飛昇、療癒的力量。
“White Drongo” is the ending song of the film “The Child of Light”. The initial conception about ending song is to deliver the feelings of going forward and fading away eventually. We expect that the ending shows the sense to nature and the impermanence of sutra expending to the unlimited ambit, and also provides people the power of inspiration and mind-curing.



影片封面相片 / 楊鈺崑 攝影

-

社群上位十五年，發表意見的成本與意見的殺傷力早不再對等，留言的重量輕得只剩一個ENTER鍵，每個人都像拿著手槍的嬰兒。

你隨意傷害別人的時候，製造了一個總有一天也會隨意傷害你的世界。

我們都想成為最正確的人，卻常常因此忘記對方是一個人，這首歌向每一個人宣示：你的正確並不賦予你傷害別人的權力。

-

《虛空現下 Return To Reality》實體通路＆數位串流持續更新中🔗：https://linktr.ee/ReturnToReality_han

《現下 Living in the Moment》 Official Music Video
：https://reurl.cc/WX4Ole

《虛空 Fake》：https://reurl.cc/yeyA2D
《係無 Isn't it》：https://reurl.cc/AR13xY
《影戲人 Theatrical》：https://reurl.cc/EZKQOR
《下夜 Midnight》：https://reurl.cc/Rbdka6
《太陽系 Solar System》：https://reurl.cc/l5LY3A
《和天空問好 How are You》：https://reurl.cc/2o4Q5n
《夢 Dreaming of You》：https://reurl.cc/351M8j
《繼續走吧 Keep Going》：https://reurl.cc/L71nYK

-

〈社會現象 Social Phenomenon〉

詞 Lyricist：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han。
曲 Composer：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han、張天偉 Myles Chang、逄捷 Chieh Pang、卞宗仁 John Pien、曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。

(客語、羅馬拼音)

在這个繁華世界上 有人跳上 乜有人跌落
cai iaˋge fanˇfaˇsii gie song iuˊnginˇtiauˇsongˊ me iuˊnginˇdiedˋlog
在逐儕面對事情上 麼个解答 愛自家去尋著
cai dagˋsaˇmien dui sii qinˇsong maˋge gieˋdabˋ oi qidˋgaˊhi qimˇdoˋ

時間及及个生活上 麼人會做 有麽人逃亡
siiˇgienˊkib kib ge senˊfad song maˋnginˇvoi zo iuˊmaˋnginˇtoˇmongˇ
莫強求大家个中意 狗吠火車 徒然
mog kiongˇkiuˇtai gaˊge zung i gieuˋpoi foˋcaˊ tuˇienˇ

啊 為麽个
a vi maˋgai
求心中公平摎合理 忒過苛求別儕人
kiuˇximˊzungˊgungˊpinˇlauˊhab liˊ tedˋgo koˊkiuˇped saˇnginˇ
啊 到底愛仰般
a do diˋoi ngiongˋbanˊ
亻厓想來想去
ngaiˇxiongˋloiˇxiongˋhi
愛 做麼个
oi zo maˋgai
正做得完美冇缺陷 無人緊在該怨怪
zang zo dedˋvanˇmiˊmoˇkiedˋham moˇnginˇginˋdo ge ien guai
啊 到底係仰般 這事無恁該
a do diˋhe ngiongˋbanˊ liaˋsii moˇanˋgoiˊ

匆匆忙忙个火車頭 有人上車 乜有人下車
cungˊcungˊmongˇmongˇge foˋcaˊteuˇiuˊnginˇsongˊcaˊme iuˊnginˇhaˊcaˊ
今這下个社會現象 麼人尋仔著解答
gimˊliaˋha ge sa fi hien xiong maˋnginˇqimˇeˋdoˋgieˋdabˋ

啊 為麽个
a vi maˋgai
求心中公平摎合理 忒過苛求別儕人
kiuˇximˊzungˊgungˊpinˇlauˊhab liˊ tedˋgo koˊkiuˇped saˇnginˇ
啊 到底愛仰般
a do diˋoi ngiongˋbanˊ
亻厓想來想去
ngaiˇxiongˋloiˇxiongˋhi
愛 做麼个
oi zo maˋgai
正做得完美冇缺陷 無人緊在該怨怪
zang zo dedˋvanˇmiˊmoˇkiedˋham moˇnginˇginˋdo ge ien guai
啊 到底係仰般 這事無恁該
a do diˋhe ngiongˋbanˊ liaˋsii moˇanˋgoiˊ

啊 為麽个
a vi maˋgai
想愛問又無人答理 忒過強求別儕人
xiongˋoi mun iu moˇnginˇdabˋliˊ tedˋgo kiongˇkiuˇped saˇnginˇ
啊 到底愛仰般
a do diˋoi ngiongˋbanˊ
亻厓想頭想尾
ngaiˇxiongˋteuˇxiongˋmiˊ
愛 做麼个
oi zo maˋgai
正毋會痛苦分陷害 無人緊在該見怪
zang mˇvoi tung kuˋbunˊham hoi moˇnginˇginˋdo ge gien guai
啊 到底係仰般 想毋來
a do diˋhe ngiongˋbanˊ xiongˋmˇloiˇ

（中文翻譯）

在這繁華世界上 有人跳上 也有人跌落
各自面對事情上 什麼解答 要自己去尋找

汲汲營營的生活 有誰會實行 有誰會逃亡
別期望大家都喜歡你 只是徒勞無功罷了

啊 為了什麼
為求心中公平合理 而過於苛求別人
啊 到底要怎樣
我輾轉反側
要做什麼
才完美無缺 沒人會在那怪罪
啊 到底是怎樣 沒有那麼容易

匆匆忙忙的火車站 有人上車 也有人下車
現今的社會現象 誰找得到解答

啊 為了什麼
為求心中公平合理 而過於苛求別人
啊 到底要怎樣
我輾轉反側
要做什麼
才能完美無缺 沒人會在那怪罪
啊 到底是怎樣 沒有那麼容易

啊 為了什麼
要問又置之不理 而過於強求別人
啊 到底要怎樣
我思前想後
要做什麼
才不會陷入痛苦又被陷害 沒人會一直在那責怪
啊 到底是怎樣 毫無頭緒

-

【音樂製作團隊】

製作人 Producer：林易祺 LNiCH。
執行製作 Executive Producer：郭冠鑫 Attis。
編曲 Music Arranger：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han 、張天偉 Myles Chang、逄捷 Chieh Pang、卞宗仁 John Pien、曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。
和聲＆和聲編寫 Chorus & Chorus Arrangement：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han。
電吉他 Electric Guitar：張天偉 Myles Chang。
鍵盤 Keyboard：卞宗仁 John Pien。
電貝斯 Electric Bass：逄捷 Chieh Pang。
爵士鼓 Drums：曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。
錄音師 Recording Engineers：林易祺 LNiCH、郭冠鑫 Attis。
錄音室 Recording Studio：給樂音樂 Gather Music Studio。
混音師 Mixing Engineer：林易祺 LNiCH。
混音錄音室 Mixing Studio：給樂音樂 Gather Music Studio。
母帶後期處理製作人 Mastering Producer：林易祺 LNiCH。
母帶後期處理工程師 Mastering Engineer：Matty Harris @ Class A Mixing and Mastering Studios。
專輯創作室 Music Composing House：節律音樂 R N' M Music Studio。
客語歌詞校正指導 Language counselor of Hakka lyrics：邱新春 Sin Chun Ciou。
羅馬拼音翻譯 Romanization Translation：王興寶 Xing bao Wang。

-

【影像製作團隊】

導演 Director：李彥勳 PHM LEE Yen Hsun。
製作 Production：切音樂電影有限公司 CHE STUDIO。
製片 Producer：林倖如 Sing-ru Lin。
製片組 Production Assistant：古朝瀚 Harry Goo。
副導演Assistant Director：高宇璇 Yu-Hsuan Kao。
攝影 Director of Photography：李彥勳 PHM LEE Yen Hsun。
第二攝影 Additional Camera ：蘇芳榆 Fang-Yu Su。
跟焦員 Focus Puller：周奕 Chou Yi。
燈光 Gaffer：廖哲揚 Yang Liao。
燈光助理 Lighting Technician：龔克勤 Gong Ke-Cin。
視訊設計 Visual Design：黃夏妤 Faustine Huang。
燈光設計 Lighting Design：邱宇森 Ciou Yu-Sen。
硬體總監 Technical Director：童智偉 Tong Jhih-Wei。
硬體工程 Equipment Engineer：朱倫 Jhu Lun、鄭鈺儒Jheng Yu-Ru。
剪輯 Editor：盧姵文 Phoebe Lu。
調色 Colorist：萬芷瑋 Abby Wan。
硬體協力 Equipment Support：野果創意有限公司 WildGain Studio。
攝影器材協力 Camera Equipment：梅西影像製作有限公司 Maximum Film Works。
服裝 Designer：彭雨忻 pengpeng。
妝髮 Make up & Hair：洪振揚 Xinzo_o。
特別感謝 Special Thanks：英傑哆攝影棚 inJECT inspiration、忠欣股份有限公司、吳奇峰。

-

【演出者】
電吉他 Electric Guitar：張天偉 Myles Chang。
電貝斯 Electric Bass：黃健倫 Crocus Huang。
鍵盤 Keyboard：卞宗仁 John Pien。
爵士鼓 Drums：曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。

-

這哪位音樂工作室出品。
本作品獲文化部影視及流行音樂產業局109年補助。

-

▶更多 黃宇寒Han 相關資訊
Facebook......https://www.facebook.com/yuhanmusic/
instagram.....https://www.instagram.com/cutehanhanh...
Youtube........https://goo.gl/1xrAzN
StreetVoice..https://streetvoice.com/dqdq212/
Twitter..........https://twitter.com/cutehanhanhuang

-

社群上位十五年，發表意見的成本與意見的殺傷力早不再對等，留言的重量輕得只剩一個ENTER鍵，每個人都像拿著手槍的嬰兒。

你隨意傷害別人的時候，製造了一個總有一天也會隨意傷害你的世界。

我們都想成為最正確的人，卻常常因此忘記對方是一個人，這首歌向每一個人宣示：你的正確並不賦予你傷害別人的權力。

-
《虛空現下 Return To Reality》實體通路數位串流持續更新中🔗：https://linktr.ee/ReturnToReality_han

〈社會現象 Social Phenomenon〉

詞 Lyricist：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han。
曲 Composer：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han、張天偉 Myles Chang、逄捷 Chieh Pang、卞宗仁 John Pien、曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。

(客語、羅馬拼音)

在這个繁華世界上 有人跳上 乜有人跌落
cai iaˋge fanˇfaˇsii gie song iuˊnginˇtiauˇsongˊ me iuˊnginˇdiedˋlog
在逐儕面對事情上 麼个解答 愛自家去尋著
cai dagˋsaˇmien dui sii qinˇsong maˋge gieˋdabˋ oi qidˋgaˊhi qimˇdoˋ

時間及及个生活上 麼人會做 有麽人逃亡
siiˇgienˊkib kib ge senˊfad song maˋnginˇvoi zo iuˊmaˋnginˇtoˇmongˇ
莫強求大家个中意 狗吠火車 徒然
mog kiongˇkiuˇtai gaˊge zung i gieuˋpoi foˋcaˊ tuˇienˇ

啊 為麽个
a vi maˋgai
求心中公平摎合理 忒過苛求別儕人
kiuˇximˊzungˊgungˊpinˇlauˊhab liˊ tedˋgo koˊkiuˇped saˇnginˇ
啊 到底愛仰般
a do diˋoi ngiongˋbanˊ
亻厓想來想去
ngaiˇxiongˋloiˇxiongˋhi
愛 做麼个
oi zo maˋgai
正做得完美冇缺陷 無人緊在該怨怪
zang zo dedˋvanˇmiˊmoˇkiedˋham moˇnginˇginˋdo ge ien guai
啊 到底係仰般 這事無恁該
a do diˋhe ngiongˋbanˊ liaˋsii moˇanˋgoiˊ

匆匆忙忙个火車頭 有人上車 乜有人下車
cungˊcungˊmongˇmongˇge foˋcaˊteuˇiuˊnginˇsongˊcaˊme iuˊnginˇhaˊcaˊ
今這下个社會現象 麼人尋仔著解答
gimˊliaˋha ge sa fi hien xiong maˋnginˇqimˇeˋdoˋgieˋdabˋ

啊 為麽个
a vi maˋgai
求心中公平摎合理 忒過苛求別儕人
kiuˇximˊzungˊgungˊpinˇlauˊhab liˊ tedˋgo koˊkiuˇped saˇnginˇ
啊 到底愛仰般
a do diˋoi ngiongˋbanˊ
亻厓想來想去
ngaiˇxiongˋloiˇxiongˋhi
愛 做麼个
oi zo maˋgai
正做得完美冇缺陷 無人緊在該怨怪
zang zo dedˋvanˇmiˊmoˇkiedˋham moˇnginˇginˋdo ge ien guai
啊 到底係仰般 這事無恁該
a do diˋhe ngiongˋbanˊ liaˋsii moˇanˋgoiˊ

啊 為麽个
a vi maˋgai
想愛問又無人答理 忒過強求別儕人
xiongˋoi mun iu moˇnginˇdabˋliˊ tedˋgo kiongˇkiuˇped saˇnginˇ
啊 到底愛仰般
a do diˋoi ngiongˋbanˊ
亻厓想頭想尾
ngaiˇxiongˋteuˇxiongˋmiˊ
愛 做麼个
oi zo maˋgai
正毋會痛苦分陷害 無人緊在該見怪
zang mˇvoi tung kuˋbunˊham hoi moˇnginˇginˋdo ge gien guai
啊 到底係仰般 想毋來
a do diˋhe ngiongˋbanˊ xiongˋmˇloiˇ

（中文翻譯）

在這繁華世界上 有人跳上 也有人跌落
各自面對事情上 什麼解答 要自己去尋找

汲汲營營的生活 有誰會實行 有誰會逃亡
別期望大家都喜歡你 只是徒勞無功罷了

啊 為了什麼
為求心中公平合理 而過於苛求別人
啊 到底要怎樣
我輾轉反側
要做什麼
才完美無缺 沒人會在那怪罪
啊 到底是怎樣 沒有那麼容易

匆匆忙忙的火車站 有人上車 也有人下車
現今的社會現象 誰找得到解答

啊 為了什麼
為求心中公平合理 而過於苛求別人
啊 到底要怎樣
我輾轉反側
要做什麼
才能完美無缺 沒人會在那怪罪
啊 到底是怎樣 沒有那麼容易

啊 為了什麼
要問又置之不理 而過於強求別人
啊 到底要怎樣
我思前想後
要做什麼
才不會陷入痛苦又被陷害 沒人會一直在那責怪
啊 到底是怎樣 毫無頭緒


-

【音樂製作及工作團隊】

製作人 Producer：林易祺 LNiCH。
執行製作 Executive Producer：郭冠鑫 Attis。
編曲 Music Arranger：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han 、張天偉 Myles Chang、逄捷 Chieh Pang、卞宗仁 John Pien、曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。
和聲＆和聲編寫 Chorus & Chorus Arrangement：黃宇寒 Huang Yu Han。
電吉他 Electric Guitar：張天偉 Myles Chang。
鍵盤 Keyboard：卞宗仁 John Pien。
電貝斯 Electric Bass：逄捷 Chieh Pang。
爵士鼓 Drums：曾景崧 Relaxx Tseng。
錄音師 Recording Engineers：林易祺 LNiCH、郭冠鑫 Attis。
錄音室 Recording Studio：給樂音樂 Gather Music Studio。
混音師 Mixing Engineer：林易祺 LNiCH。
混音錄音室 Mixing Studio：給樂音樂 Gather Music Studio。
母帶後期處理製作人 Mastering Producer：林易祺 LNiCH。
母帶後期處理工程師 Mastering Engineer：Matty Harris @ Class A Mixing and Mastering Studios。
專輯創作室 Music Composing House：節律音樂 R N' M Music Studio。
客語歌詞校正指導 Language counselor of Hakka lyrics：邱新春 Sin Chun Ciou。
羅馬拼音翻譯 Romanization Translation：王興寶 Xing bao Wang。

-

這哪位音樂工作室出品
本作品獲文化部影視及流行音樂產業局補助。

-

▶更多 黃宇寒Han 相關資訊
Facebook......https://www.facebook.com/yuhanmusic/
instagram.....https://www.instagram.com/cutehanhanh...
Youtube........https://goo.gl/1xrAzN
StreetVoice..https://streetvoice.com/dqdq212/
Twitter..........https://twitter.com/cutehanhanhuang