＃領展
Albert 's concern is about "the politicians should have targeted the Link instead." First, as the one who drafted the motion, I have the greatest responsibility on this. Yet I could say with great confidence that he has extremely twisted the truth. The motion is strongly related to the Link. It has directly indicated the consequence of its disposing non-profitable properties act caused by government policy.
\\This Council objects to the Government’s relaxation of the Code on Real Estate Investment Trusts, which encourages the Link REIT’s resale of shopping centres divested by the Housing Authority (HA) previously...This Council does not wish to have any further resale of the remaining shopping centre properties by the Link REIT\\(本會反對政府放寬《房地產投資信託基金守則》，鼓勵領展轉售前房委會商場，包括南區華貴及田灣商場，令區內商舖銳減，無法切合居民需要。本會不希望領展進一步拆售南區其餘商場物業。)http://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/…/DDHC_2017_10_EN_Annex_…
As a notable representative of anti-linkreit movement, I hope he could think twice about what he said. And coincidently, I have written an article about this on Appledaily. Hopefully, a more established explanation could be provided.
這讓我對排緊隊的蘋果日報投稿，有更大更興奮的期待。
蘋果日報投稿 在 [閒聊]有關報紙投稿- 看板eWriter - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
小弟我稱不上是網路小說家 但也有在寫小說 只是尚未發表過
國中時熱愛看小說 也因此喜歡上文字 那時抱著試試看的心態在蘋果日報投稿
卻運氣很好地中了兩篇 感覺蠻有趣的又可以賺點小錢 看到自己的文章在報紙上
出現那種感覺難以形容啊 不過後來課業繁忙 最近才開始又有空 轉眼都已大四..
10月份運氣不錯 又在蘋果日報中了兩篇 有在注意的人應該都知道蘋果日報的人間事
都是比較腥羶色 違背倫理之類的文章 ...
不知這版的大大們除了寫小說會去投稿這種文章嗎？
也順便想問問有沒有哪裡是介紹這種投稿資訊的呢
我覺得應該還有很多 但都不太好找
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.223.240.172
※ 編輯: lk2986706we 來自: 61.223.240.172 (11/13 18:58)
... <看更多>