關於 visual math ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

林立老師講義 多益篇

All Things Must Pass. But the Prom, Somehow, Goes On.

Since the 1950s, prom photos have been bellwethers ( ) of a changing America. At one high school just outside New York City, the prom ( ) is still the main event.

Ever since Life magazine photographed a marathon ( ) prom at Mariemont High School near Cincinnati in 1958, proms have been a staple ( ) of American photojournalism, visual check-ins on the dreams, egos ( ), libidos ( ), fashions and sometimes the segregated ( ) realities of the nation’s youth, dressed to the nines ( ) and up all night to get lucky, or just to have fun.

Hard to believe the things still exist, really.

The prom at Raymond C. Cramer Secondary School in Goshen, N.Y., 50 miles north of the city, puts its own spin on those traditions. The students — just 120, from four grades — commute ( ) from several surrounding ( ) counties, and few have drivers’ licenses, so their social interactions, including dating, are largely confined to ( ) the school day, or through social media. Romance, here, typically yields to ( ) distance.

Prom is not a night for couples.

“We have a few, but it’s really about your friends,” said Melody Geroux, a math teacher and prom chairwoman at the school, where she has taught since 1995. Students arrived solo ( ), with their parents, and then connected with friends inside.

Boys danced in groups of boys; girls with girls. Intoxicants ( )? Nowhere to be seen, said Allyse Pulliam, the photographer, who said she was drawn to the prom by the sheer ( ) joy of it. “It felt more pure” than her own four high school proms, she said. “I cried like three times.”(Source: nytimes.com, May 25th, 2019)

凡事皆有期，但畢業舞會似乎不在此限

自1950年代起，畢業舞會照片一直帶領改變美國。在紐約市區外的一處高中，畢業舞會仍舊是一大盛事。

自從「生活」(Life)雜誌1958年拍攝辛辛那提州附近馬里蒙高中(Mariemont High School)的馬拉松式畢業舞會，畢業舞會便成為美國攝影記者的重頭戲，藉由影像了解高中畢業生的夢想、自我、慾望、時尚，有時還有美國年輕人種族隔離的事實。他們盛裝打扮、徹夜不眠看能否幸運獲得他人青睞或純粹為了好玩。

說實話，很難相信這些事至今仍然存在。

紐約州戈申村(Goshen)Raymond C. Cramer中學位於紐約市以北50里，該校畢業舞會將這些傳統注入自己的特色。該校四個年級僅有120名學生，他們從多個鄰郡通勤上學，幾乎沒人有駕照，因此約會等社交多侷限於上學日或社群媒體。在這裡談情說愛通常得屈服於距離。

畢業舞會並非情侶之夜。

該校數學老師與畢業舞會主席美樂蒂．吉魯(Melody Geroux)自1995年在此任教至今，她表示：「本校有一些情侶，但畢業舞會其實是和朋友玩樂。」學生由家長送來，他們未攜伴然後進校和朋友相聚。

男生和一群男生跳舞，女生則和女生跳舞。酒呢？攝影師阿莉絲．普莉姆(Allyse Pulliam)表示，到處都沒看到。普莉姆說她來畢業舞會是因為其中單純的喜悅。她說，這跟她的高中畢業舞會相比，「我覺得更單純，我可能哭了三遍了吧。」

#高雄人 #學習英文 請找 #多益達人林立英文
#高中英文 #成人英文
#多益家教班 #商用英文
#國立大學外國語文學系講師

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

https://www.humblebundle.com/…/computer-graphics-crc-press-…
วันสุดท้ายสำหรับ HUMBLE BOOK BUNDLE: COMPUTER GRAPHICS BY CRC PRESS โดยแพคนี้จะหมดเวลาในตอน ตี 1 ที่จะถึงนี้ หรือเหลือเวลาอีกราว 11 ชั่วโมงก่อนหมดเวลา
.
ส่วนแพคนี้ รายละเอียดมีดังนี้
.
จ่าย $1 รับ
- 3D Engine Design for Virtual Globes
- The Uncanny Valley in Games and Animation
- Production Volume Rendering
- Real-Time Volume Graphics
.
จ่าย $8 รับเพิ่ม
- Essential Skills in Character Rigging
- Ray Tracing from the Ground Up
- OpenGL Insights
- Real-Time Shadows
- Multithreading for Visual Effects
- Graphics Shaders - Second Edition
- Fluid Simulation for Computer Graphics - Second Edition
- Digital Representations of the Real World: How to Capture, Model, and Render Visual Reality
.
จ่าย $15 รับเพิ่ม
- 3D Math Primer for Graphics and Game Development - Second Edition
- GPGPU Programming for Games and Science
- Mobile Crowd Sensing
- Interaction Design for 3D User Interfaces
- Digital Character Development: Theory and Practice - Second Edition
- The Art of Fluid Animation
- Ultra-Realistic Imaging
.
รายละเอียดเพิ่มเติมดูที่หน้าร้านค้า
https://www.humblebundle.com/…/computer-graphics-crc-press-…
.
อนึ่ง eBook ภาษาอังกฤษล้วนๆ (ไฟล์ PDF, EPUB และ CBZ)
.
อสอง ดีลนี้หมดเวลาในตอน ตี 1 ที่จะถึงนี้
.
หนังสือดีราคาถูกแบบนี้
ไม่สอยได้ไงพี่น้องงงง
https://www.humblebundle.com/…/computer-graphics-crc-press-…
-------------------------------
Steam Wallet, Battle.net Code, PSN ซื้อง่าย ได้โค๊ดทันที >> GGKeyStore.com
-------------------------------
สั่งจองเสื้อเพจ เกมถูกบอกด้วย ราคาเริ่มต้น 350 บาท ดูที่นี่ - https://forms.gle/JbapJS5K4ToPKptR8

JAVA證照考題解答分享(Android證照的跳板)
http://terry55wu.blogspot.tw/2014/01/javaandroid.html

課程大綱：
1.認識 AWT類別
2.認識並學習如何建立視窗物件
3.學習如何管理與配置版面
4.事件處理：1.認識 Java的委派事件模式。2.認識並學習使用各種事件處理類別。3.學習各種物件的事件處理 。

之後：
1.分享最新的JAVA DOCS資訊與中文化版本，
並設定ECLIPSE直接讀取JAVA說明檔的設定方法。
2.利用實例綜合練習變數宣告、資料型別、運算子、
流程控制的IF...ELSE與各種迴圈方法的應用。
3.說明陣列與多維陣列的使用與實例。
漸漸更深入JAVA語法的核心，有些同學似乎已經吃不消，
但有些同學可能以前學過，所以一下子就解出來了，
也很大方的分享出他的解法，
不過這樣有時反而讓一些沒學過JAVA的同學備感壓力。
因為老師以為大家都會了，所以就加速往前，害一些同學在後面趕的很辛苦，
腦筋已經被迴圈給轉的頭昏，還沒弄懂題目，又要接下一題，
所以真有點兩難，好在助教的提醒，有稍放慢一點進度，
若有程度較好的同學，請些自行預息後面的課程，
或是先準備TQC JAVA的學術科考題好了，再不然好心一點，
充當一下老師的分身，幫忙同學一下，感謝！

101模擬樂透彩
102系統日期、時間顯示
103亂數排序器
104河洛之數
105陣列行列轉換
106數值過濾器
107求平均值
108九九乘法表
109面積與體積計算
110單字測驗
202利息計算
204期末考分數計算
206四則運算
208三角形邊長判斷
210字元搜尋器
302字體設定選擇器
304簡易繪圖板
306滑鼠感應視窗
308藝人音樂評等
310年齡計算

相關JAVA教學：
發表時間 文章標題
2015-06-22 JAVA網路程式設計第1天上課分享(HTML 5與JavaScript)
2015-06-21 艾鍗JAVA物件導向程式設計2(流程控制)
2015-06-21 JAVA程式設計第2次上課(環境安裝與變數與Math類別)
2015-06-20 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第2次上課
2015-06-20 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第1次上課
2015-01-16 如何在JAVA顯示河洛之數結果
2015-01-16 如何在JAVA顯示系統時間並格式化
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向設計第3堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向設計第2堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向第1堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2014-01-20 佛光資應系JAVA證照考題解答分享(Android證照的跳板)
2013-08-19 艾鍗JAVA物件導向程式設計課程上課影音分享(2)
2013-08-02 總統府旁JAVA網路程式設計第2天上課分享
2013-08-02 總統府旁JAVA網路程式設計第1天上課分享
2013-03-15 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第2次上課
2013-03-11 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計(1)
2012-10-27 有七星潭海浪聲的JAVA入門與證照分享
2012-09-14 JAVA程式設計第7次上課
2012-08-29 JAVA程式設計第1次上課
2012-05-31 有七星潭海浪聲的JAVA入門與證照分享1
2012-04-08 JAVA證照考題解答分享，Android證照的跳板
2012-01-25 JAVA證照考題解答分享，Android證照的跳板
2011-10-04 JAVA程式設計總整理
2010-10-30 湜憶電腦 TQC JAVA進階級先修課程之二
2010-10-30 湜憶電腦 TQC JAVA進階級先修課程
2010-05-30 最近的生活很JAVA--分享GOOGLE服務在教學上的應用
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 5 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 4 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 3 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 2 次上課
2010-05-30 程式語言排行榜，C語言居冠，JAVA次之
2010-05-30 最近的生活很JAVA--分享GOOGLE服務在教學上的應用
2010-05-22 JAVA程式設計第2次上課(環境安裝與變數與Math類別)
2009-08-27 TQC JavaScipt 實用級線上影音
2009-08-24 TQC JavaScipt 線上影音教學課程 101自動瀏覽器
2009-03-12 Java、VisualBasic、Visual C++有什麼不一樣呢?

java下載,jdk,eclipse,java教學網站,java教學影片,java eclipse教學,eclipse 教學,java證照解答,AWT類別, 電腦證照

JAVA證照考題解答分享(Android證照的跳板)
http://terry55wu.blogspot.tw/2014/01/javaandroid.html

課程大綱：
1.認識 AWT類別
2.認識並學習如何建立視窗物件
3.學習如何管理與配置版面
4.事件處理：1.認識 Java的委派事件模式。2.認識並學習使用各種事件處理類別。3.學習各種物件的事件處理 。

之後：
1.分享最新的JAVA DOCS資訊與中文化版本，
並設定ECLIPSE直接讀取JAVA說明檔的設定方法。
2.利用實例綜合練習變數宣告、資料型別、運算子、
流程控制的IF...ELSE與各種迴圈方法的應用。
3.說明陣列與多維陣列的使用與實例。
漸漸更深入JAVA語法的核心，有些同學似乎已經吃不消，
但有些同學可能以前學過，所以一下子就解出來了，
也很大方的分享出他的解法，
不過這樣有時反而讓一些沒學過JAVA的同學備感壓力。
因為老師以為大家都會了，所以就加速往前，害一些同學在後面趕的很辛苦，
腦筋已經被迴圈給轉的頭昏，還沒弄懂題目，又要接下一題，
所以真有點兩難，好在助教的提醒，有稍放慢一點進度，
若有程度較好的同學，請些自行預息後面的課程，
或是先準備TQC JAVA的學術科考題好了，再不然好心一點，
充當一下老師的分身，幫忙同學一下，感謝！

101模擬樂透彩
102系統日期、時間顯示
103亂數排序器
104河洛之數
105陣列行列轉換
106數值過濾器
107求平均值
108九九乘法表
109面積與體積計算
110單字測驗
202利息計算
204期末考分數計算
206四則運算
208三角形邊長判斷
210字元搜尋器
302字體設定選擇器
304簡易繪圖板
306滑鼠感應視窗
308藝人音樂評等
310年齡計算

相關JAVA教學：
發表時間 文章標題
2015-06-22 JAVA網路程式設計第1天上課分享(HTML 5與JavaScript)
2015-06-21 艾鍗JAVA物件導向程式設計2(流程控制)
2015-06-21 JAVA程式設計第2次上課(環境安裝與變數與Math類別)
2015-06-20 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第2次上課
2015-06-20 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第1次上課
2015-01-16 如何在JAVA顯示河洛之數結果
2015-01-16 如何在JAVA顯示系統時間並格式化
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向設計第3堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向設計第2堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向第1堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2014-01-20 佛光資應系JAVA證照考題解答分享(Android證照的跳板)
2013-08-19 艾鍗JAVA物件導向程式設計課程上課影音分享(2)
2013-08-02 總統府旁JAVA網路程式設計第2天上課分享
2013-08-02 總統府旁JAVA網路程式設計第1天上課分享
2013-03-15 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第2次上課
2013-03-11 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計(1)
2012-10-27 有七星潭海浪聲的JAVA入門與證照分享
2012-09-14 JAVA程式設計第7次上課
2012-08-29 JAVA程式設計第1次上課
2012-05-31 有七星潭海浪聲的JAVA入門與證照分享1
2012-04-08 JAVA證照考題解答分享，Android證照的跳板
2012-01-25 JAVA證照考題解答分享，Android證照的跳板
2011-10-04 JAVA程式設計總整理
2010-10-30 湜憶電腦 TQC JAVA進階級先修課程之二
2010-10-30 湜憶電腦 TQC JAVA進階級先修課程
2010-05-30 最近的生活很JAVA--分享GOOGLE服務在教學上的應用
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 5 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 4 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 3 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 2 次上課
2010-05-30 程式語言排行榜，C語言居冠，JAVA次之
2010-05-30 最近的生活很JAVA--分享GOOGLE服務在教學上的應用
2010-05-22 JAVA程式設計第2次上課(環境安裝與變數與Math類別)
2009-08-27 TQC JavaScipt 實用級線上影音
2009-08-24 TQC JavaScipt 線上影音教學課程 101自動瀏覽器
2009-03-12 Java、VisualBasic、Visual C++有什麼不一樣呢?

java下載,jdk,eclipse,java教學網站,java教學影片,java eclipse教學,eclipse 教學,java證照解答,AWT類別, 電腦證照

JAVA證照考題解答分享(Android證照的跳板)
http://terry55wu.blogspot.tw/2014/01/javaandroid.html

課程大綱：
1.認識 AWT類別
2.認識並學習如何建立視窗物件
3.學習如何管理與配置版面
4.事件處理：1.認識 Java的委派事件模式。2.認識並學習使用各種事件處理類別。3.學習各種物件的事件處理 。

之後：
1.分享最新的JAVA DOCS資訊與中文化版本，
並設定ECLIPSE直接讀取JAVA說明檔的設定方法。
2.利用實例綜合練習變數宣告、資料型別、運算子、
流程控制的IF...ELSE與各種迴圈方法的應用。
3.說明陣列與多維陣列的使用與實例。
漸漸更深入JAVA語法的核心，有些同學似乎已經吃不消，
但有些同學可能以前學過，所以一下子就解出來了，
也很大方的分享出他的解法，
不過這樣有時反而讓一些沒學過JAVA的同學備感壓力。
因為老師以為大家都會了，所以就加速往前，害一些同學在後面趕的很辛苦，
腦筋已經被迴圈給轉的頭昏，還沒弄懂題目，又要接下一題，
所以真有點兩難，好在助教的提醒，有稍放慢一點進度，
若有程度較好的同學，請些自行預息後面的課程，
或是先準備TQC JAVA的學術科考題好了，再不然好心一點，
充當一下老師的分身，幫忙同學一下，感謝！

101模擬樂透彩
102系統日期、時間顯示
103亂數排序器
104河洛之數
105陣列行列轉換
106數值過濾器
107求平均值
108九九乘法表
109面積與體積計算
110單字測驗
202利息計算
204期末考分數計算
206四則運算
208三角形邊長判斷
210字元搜尋器
302字體設定選擇器
304簡易繪圖板
306滑鼠感應視窗
308藝人音樂評等
310年齡計算

相關JAVA教學：
發表時間 文章標題
2015-06-22 JAVA網路程式設計第1天上課分享(HTML 5與JavaScript)
2015-06-21 艾鍗JAVA物件導向程式設計2(流程控制)
2015-06-21 JAVA程式設計第2次上課(環境安裝與變數與Math類別)
2015-06-20 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第2次上課
2015-06-20 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第1次上課
2015-01-16 如何在JAVA顯示河洛之數結果
2015-01-16 如何在JAVA顯示系統時間並格式化
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向設計第3堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向設計第2堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2015-01-16 JAVA物件導向第1堂課：JSP與APP跳板
2014-01-20 佛光資應系JAVA證照考題解答分享(Android證照的跳板)
2013-08-19 艾鍗JAVA物件導向程式設計課程上課影音分享(2)
2013-08-02 總統府旁JAVA網路程式設計第2天上課分享
2013-08-02 總統府旁JAVA網路程式設計第1天上課分享
2013-03-15 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計第2次上課
2013-03-11 從JAVA入門到智慧型手機設計(1)
2012-10-27 有七星潭海浪聲的JAVA入門與證照分享
2012-09-14 JAVA程式設計第7次上課
2012-08-29 JAVA程式設計第1次上課
2012-05-31 有七星潭海浪聲的JAVA入門與證照分享1
2012-04-08 JAVA證照考題解答分享，Android證照的跳板
2012-01-25 JAVA證照考題解答分享，Android證照的跳板
2011-10-04 JAVA程式設計總整理
2010-10-30 湜憶電腦 TQC JAVA進階級先修課程之二
2010-10-30 湜憶電腦 TQC JAVA進階級先修課程
2010-05-30 最近的生活很JAVA--分享GOOGLE服務在教學上的應用
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 5 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 4 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 3 次上課
2010-05-30 文化大學推廣部JAVA程式設計第 2 次上課
2010-05-30 程式語言排行榜，C語言居冠，JAVA次之
2010-05-30 最近的生活很JAVA--分享GOOGLE服務在教學上的應用
2010-05-22 JAVA程式設計第2次上課(環境安裝與變數與Math類別)
2009-08-27 TQC JavaScipt 實用級線上影音
2009-08-24 TQC JavaScipt 線上影音教學課程 101自動瀏覽器
2009-03-12 Java、VisualBasic、Visual C++有什麼不一樣呢?

java下載,jdk,eclipse,java教學網站,java教學影片,java eclipse教學,eclipse 教學,java證照解答,AWT類別, 電腦證照