關於 top 25 hotels in the world ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

ข่าวประชาสัมพันธ์..
แสนสิริ เสนอขายหุ้นกู้ด้อยสิทธิที่มีลักษณะคล้ายทุนฯ ดอกเบี้ย 5 ปีแรก 8.50% ต่อปี

บริษัท แสนสิริ จำกัด (มหาชน) หรือ SIRI มีแผนเสนอขาย Subordinated Perpetual Bond หรือ หุ้นกู้ด้อยสิทธิที่มีลักษณะคล้ายทุนฯ โดยการเสนอขายหุ้นกู้ด้อยสิทธิที่มีลักษณะคล้ายทุนฯ ครั้งนี้ เป็นการวางแผนด้านการเงินเพื่อรองรับการเติบโตในระยะยาวของบริษัท เพื่อให้เป็นไปตามเป้าหมายของการรักษาความเป็นเบอร์หนึ่งในเรื่อง “แบรนด์อันดับหนึ่งของคนอยากมีบ้านในวงการอสังหาริมทรัพย์ไทย” อย่างต่อเนื่...
Continue ReadingPress Release..
Sansiri offers to sell inferior loan shares with similarities. Interest 5 first 8.50 % per year.

Sansiri Public Company Limited or SIRI has a plan to offer Subordinated Perpetual Bond or Unintelligible Equity Equity by proposing to sell inferior equity equity with similarities. This is a financial planning to support the long-term growth of the company. To meet the goal of maintaining the number one in ′′ the number one brand of people who want to have a house in Thai real estate industry ′′ and maintaining a stable business growth.

Offer to the average investor worth not more than 3,000 million baht. Minimum booking of 100,000 baht and multiply 100,000 baht per time. Interest rate in the first 5 years equals 8.50 % per year. Pay interest every 3 months.

Sansiri is the leading real estate company in Thailand. It has been in business for more than 36 years. There is a project in Bangkok (90 %) and other provinces (10 %) covering all groups of single, townhouse and condominium. Niams include the price level that drilled Mass Market group from 1.2 million baht to Luxury items that drill high-income groups, including joint venture for condominium projects with big business groups such as venture. With BTS group and Tokyu Corporation from Japan

As Sansiri has a comprehensive project, all products help to diversify risks of companies. For example, if any cartel or product level is affected by the economy or popularity, companies are capable of having products that respond to a product or a price level of product. Another product group has made it not to lean on the income from the product or one customer group.

In addition to the main income from property development, the company also has income from other businesses to distribute risks.

1. Project management income and representative in buying, selling and renting through the company. Plus Property Company.

2. In 2017, the company expanded its business to foreign countries by acquisition of Hotel Chain named The Standard with hotels under international management such as New York, LA and London.

3. Investing in technology businesses through the Corporate Venture Capital of a company called SIRI Ventures to find investment opportunities in new technologies around the world.

Income and profit of Sansiri

Year 2017 Income 31,757 million baht. Profit 2,824 million baht.
Year 2018 Income 27,146 million baht. Profit 2,046 million baht.
Year 2019 Income 26,291 million baht. Profit 2,392 million baht.

Sansiri's results may be going up and down each year, depending on the delivery of the project each year.

In addition, the past investment started to make some profits to Sansiri for the first quarter of this year. The company recorded the profit of Co-working Space shares called JustCo by record profit of over 700 million Baht.

What is the plan for future Sansiri growth?

Sansiri has announced its goal to be 1th in the Plains (House and Townhome) project, which proceeds from Plains are relatively stable in comparison with condominium project to help fluctuate income. Less in the future

Including Expansion of The Standard Hotel and International Investments to continually expand the revenue base and distribute the company's risks.

In addition, Sansiri has a plan to push sales to grow to 120,000 million Baht within 3 years with strong proactive business plan. 3 ways include:

1. Plans to launch a new project that is tightly transformed to any situation. In half a year after assessment of scenarios, Sansiri has a business plan to move forward to launch 14 new residential projects to support 14 single houses. 6 Townhome and mix project 6 more projects worth 15,200 million baht, including 2 condominium launch plan. Total value of 2,500 million baht.

2. Good stock management. Now Sansiri has ready-to-sell products worth around 7,000 million baht, which is a balanced amount in the market.

3. Strong cash flow management and good liquidity allocated Cash Flow. The company's turnover is up to 10,000 million Baht. It's ready to run the business and is strong in every Council. The company has also scaled the 2563 sales target. Increased to 35,000 million baht, up to 76 % from the last year with total sales of 21,000 million Baht. Due to the result of the business just 5 months ago, it generated sales of over 22,000 million Baht. Growing to 168 % from the same period of the year before

For Sansiri's underlying loan, Sansiri will be reserved between 22-25 June 2563 The company's credibility ranks at BBB +/ Negative and the trust of the loan. At BBB-Ranked by Tris Rating on April 1, 2563

Important terms of inferior loan. The right that resembles the capital comprises.
1. The age of the stock loan is the loan. This time is the loan. No age of the shareholder has no right to give the loan to redeem the lender before the due to redemption. But the lender has the right to redeem 5 years.
2. How to get a refund. If the company finishes the business, this loan will have a decrease in debt after the general creditor, but before the ordinary shareholder.
3. The loan issuer has the right to postpone the interest. This loan, the loan shark can delay the interest by flattering to pay any day. No time and number of times. But if delayed the interest of the loan, the lender will be paid. Cannot announce or pay dividends to shareholders.
4. Interest rates will be fined every 5 years based on 5 years of government bond yield.

Interested people can ask for more information from 6 top financial institutions:
Bangkok Bank. Call 1333
Krungthai Bank. Call 0-2111-111
Kasikorn Bank. Call 0-2888-8888 Press 819
Siam Commercial Bank. Call 0-2777-6784
CIMB Thai Bank. Call 0-2626-7777
And the Bor. Finn cuddle p.m. Cyrus call 0-2658-9500

Or www.sansiri.com; call. 1685
Or more details can be found from the listing, bidding, and prospectus at www.sec.or.th

< Important Warning >
1. Understands of the right to resemble capital. High risk product. Investors should study and understand the product characteristics, conditions, returns and risks before making investment decision. Investment is risky. Please complete the information before making investment decision. Investors can be able to. Discover details from the listing and draft of prospectus at www.sec.or.th
2. Bond market in Thailand has low liquidity. Selling instruments in secondary market could be reduced or increased by depending on market conditions and demand.
Top 3. credibility of a regulator is just an investment decision-making data. Not an introduction of trading on a proposed bond and not a guarantee of the ability to pay the debt of an instrument and when the loan issuer stops paying interest. (In case the company is not informed. Postpone the interest of loan) or early money is default to pay the loan debt (default). If the loan issuer declares bankruptcy or defaults to pay the debt, the shareholders, and other creditors of the company, the loan will have the right north. Common shareholder of the company, issuer in the assessment of the credit risk of lenders, investors can see the results of the credibility ratings of the lenders or lenders (credit rating) provided by institutions. Risk rankings, making investment decisions if credit. Rating of low borrower or lender shows that credit risk of lenders or lenders is high. Returns of investors should be high to compensate for the high risk of lenders.Translated

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

"Dream to Nantou" is an original song written and performed by Sandy H.
Listen on Spotify / Apple Music ⏩ https://backl.ink/142602169

More about Nantou ⏩ https://eng.taiwan.net.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0002114
"If the central region is the heartland of Taiwan, Nantou is Taiwan's heart: it is the only landlocked county on the island! There are dozens of well-planned recreational farm areas that are perfect for a quiet and leisurely family trip to the countryside. Accommodation choices range from world-class resort hotels to rural B&Bs. Whether you choose to stay at an exotic villa at Qingjing Farm or an elegant room at Puli Tao-Mi Eco-Village, you are never far from nature's scenic embrace. Whenever and wherever you arrive, Nantou is there to welcome you on a relaxing, fun, and eye-opening journey."

【 Dream to Nantou 】Lyrics:
Feel the wind and come along with me
hold my hand as you breathe
let me treat you some oolong tea

Feel the sun
in this landlocked county
but you could see its beauty
the waters are crystal clear

I had a dream of me and you
stopping by at a wide green tea farm
you held me when we were
sitting by the sun moon lake
don't wanna sleep
don't wanna leave
in such a good sensation
climbing up to the top of the mountains
sharing a B&B room

Nantou is where we first met
a starry night that I will never ever forget
Nantou is where everything began
so why don't we make it all happen before summer ends
so why don't we make it all happen before summer ends

Hear the trees
blowing with the breeze
can't find a better place to be
a simple but mindful trip

I had a dream
of me and you
hanging out with adorable sheep
Don't need no creams for face
living in the lush forests
don't wanna sleep
don't wanna leave
in such a good sensation
laughing like children with no burden
crying like the waterfalls

Nantou is where we first met
a starry night that I will never ever forget
Nantou is where everything began
so why don't we make it all happen before the summer ends
so why don't we make it all happen before the summer ends

the heart of my home
is where we're gonna go
the heart of my home
is where we're gonna go
the heart of my home
is where we're gonna go
the heart of my home
so why don't we make it all happen before the summer ends
so why don't we make it all happen before the summer ends

☀️出品 Presented by ｜南投縣政府 Nantou County Government ＆ 黃小玫影音工作室 HXM STUDIO

☀️Music Production 音樂製作
演唱／詞／曲 Performed / Lyrics / Composed by ｜ @Sandy H. 黃小玫
製作 Produced by ｜黃小玫 Sandy H. & Stelios
混音 Mixing & Mastering | Romano Erafficci

☀️Video Production 影像製作
監製 Executive Producer ｜邱于庭 Sunny C.
導演 Director ｜黃小玫 Sandy H. ＆ 高偉鳴
製片｜邱于庭 Sunny C.
攝影｜高偉鳴
執行製片｜高偉鳴
後期導演｜黃小玫 Sandy H. 邱于庭Sunny C.
後製｜高偉鳴＆Sam

☀️小玫的其他影片 Other videos by Sandy H. ☀️
・【我在南投心自由】 https://youtu.be/khpSzzevhVU
・【台湾で会おうね！】我們在台灣見吧! https://youtu.be/MtHwzjZSJxk
・【屏東 KEEP GOING！】（2020全中運主題曲) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We7x6WIGS9E
・【海與光】(我們在屏東見吧！）https://youtu.be/SMXyXMKUBdM

☀️Follow me on:
FACEBOOK PAGE: https://www.facebook.com/Ms.HXM/
Instagram: sandy.hxm