關於 one class 評價 ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

🌻Docusign(DOCU), Crowdstrike(CRWD)財報結果
上週這兩家公司發表財報了.

這兩天看了一下他們的財報結果. Again, 兩家的表現都很好, 但發現分析師給DOCU的調價(往上)幅度比較多, 就好奇研究了一下SaaS公司是怎麼被估值的. 有興趣的話可以看看(從中學習到很多. 非常推薦一讀):
https://makingsenseofusastocks.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html

(By the way, 分析師對CRWD的價格調幅沒那麼大, 主因是成長趨緩了. 而DOCU的free cash flow佔營收比, 以及顧客黏著力在這季創了新高, 是讓分析師按讚的幾個原因).

關於CRWD: "The Street is already modeling revenue growth deceleration in 2022 to 36%, down from 60% expected in 2021, which on its own might prove a hurdle for a stock already trading at a high multiple," said Bank of America analyst Tal Liani in a report.

分析師對於DOCU的評價:
• 11位buy; 給的價格分別是: $310, $320 (x2), $330 (x2), $340 (x2), $345, $350, $350, $389
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst continues to view them as a best in class way to play digital transformation trends with strong growth, cash flow and profitability, and a strong competitive position. Power said DocuSign remains one of his top long-term compounding growth ideas.
o Citi: While slightly shy of the double-digit billings beat in recent quarters, DocuSign still delivered a solid 8% beat to Q2 billings, which grew 47% year-over-year, Radke tells investors in a research note.
o Evercore ISI: he calls "another strong quarter." While some may have wanted to see more aggressive Q3 billings guidance, he believes estimates "continue to leave room for upside," Materne said.
o JMP Securities: While revenue growth decelerated to 50% from 58% in Q1, the company is the clear leader in electronic signature and the broader system of agreement having crossed over 1M customers with a $2B run rate this quarter, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that he sees lots of room for growth as DocuSign targets a $50B total addressable market.
o Needham: The analyst commented, "Docusign reported another strong quarter in 2QF22 with typical DOCU upside to revenue and profitability. Sales metrics and growth decelerated Q/Q, as we expected against a massive pandemic quarter, but at a much slower rate than we believe much of the Street was anticipating. 65k net new customers was lower than the 70k - 90 range of CY20 but was still more than 2x greater than any pre-pandemic quarter, highlighting a strong end-market driving 47% billings growth against a strong comp. Commentary on incremental Agreement Cloud demand was positive, suggesting an additional growth tailwind combined with solid international can further aid 2HF22. Although DOCU shares could be lower near-term due to weak 2H OpMg guidance, we think this guidance is conservative, as the recent OM was greater than the pre-pandemic level even with tough comps."
o RBC Capital: The quarter highlighted the sustainability of the company's tailwinds post-pandemic as most of its underlying metrics such as billings and net revenue retention were solid, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that the traction with CLM and Notary was also "impressive".

分析師對於CRWD的評價:
• 12位buy; 給的價格分別是: $300, $310 (x2), $313, $315 (x2) , $305, $320, $325, $330 (x2), $340
• 1位給hold: $280 (from $220 by J.P. Morgan(same))
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst believes the company has significant room for growth with core modules, opportunities with Humio and in cloud workload security, among others, should help drive a continuation of strong growth over a long time horizon.
o BTIG: The company's "strong" Q2 results "cleared every hurdle", even though the buy-side benchmarks may have been slightly higher, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Powell adds that Crowdstrike is clearly gaining share in its core endpoint security target market at a rapid pace and gaining traction with new products across multiple categories.
o Canaccord: The analyst said the stock is down from its recent highs, and he thinks the re-rating creates a more favorable entry point for longer-oriented investors for a foundational security name. He views Crowdstrike as a long-term secular winner in security due to its native cloud platform advantage versus closely held peers in endpoint security combined with platform expansion into tangential segments to capture greater share of security budgets.
o Goldman Sachs: CrowdStrike last night delivered "another beat and raise quarter as the company benefited from another quarter of elevated demand," Essex said. But it traded lower following net new annual recurring revenue growth guidance that was slightly less than investors had hoped for. Essex, nonetheless, said the quarter demonstrated CrowdStrike's "ability to continue to go down market efficiently."
o JMP Securities: The analyst notes the company's Q2 annualized recurring revenue of $1.34B topping his estimate of $1.30B, with "sustained" 70% ARR and revenue growth along with margin upside seen as key highlights for the quarter. Suppiger adds that the metrics reflect Crowdstrike's "strong execution and robust demand environment".
o Mizuho: "very good" fiscal Q2 results. The annual recurring revenue growth of 70% year-over-year "was strong and still nicely surpassed" the Street's 65%-66% estimate, Moskowitz tells investors in a research note. He believes "strong execution can propel" Crowdstrike's stock higher.
o Piper Sandler: The company's metrics "outperformed across the board" in Q2 with 70% annual recurring revenue and revenue growth and record net new customer adds in the quarter, Owens tells investors in a research note.
o RBC Capital: Hedberg adds that CrowdStrike's record pipeline entering Q3 should continue to fuel the company's "land-and-expand" momentum.
o Stifel: Q2 results that he said "exceeded consensus estimates across all major financial metrics." He continues to believe that Crowdstrike's growth opportunity "remains in the early days" despite the company's scale given continued share capture within its core endpoint security market and incremental module adoption on the Falcon Platform, Reback tells investors.
o UBS: the company reported "pretty good" Q2 results against high expectations.

🌻趨勢: 跨境電商 Cross-border commerce
Morgan Stanley:
From our perspective, we think many are underestimating what the cross-border eCommerce demand could ultimately be, once key friction points like FX rates, tax and duties, shipping, language, etc are smoothed—all issues that Global-E directly addresses.

Cross-border ecommerce brings new, high-yield volume: We think elevated levels of cross-border ecommerce (ex-travel) is a structural shift thathas yet to be fully contemplated in MA (and V)'s long-term forecasts. MA's cross-border CNP ex-travel volume was 69% above 2019's level in 2Q and 63% higher in 1Q. Strength reflects both broader ecommerce adoption plus globalization of commerce, as marketplaces and services that reduce cross-border friction (such as those from GLBE) make international online ordering more readily adopted. Early data at V suggests greater cross-border ecommerce spend is persisting even in areas with pre-pandemic levels of international travel. Cross-border transactions also come at a higher yield, making us more optimistic that the trend can bring incremental long-term growth to the networks.

產業的潮流是有連貫性的. 疫情讓電商更發達後, 接下來應該就是加速電商跨境了. 跨境的話, 有很多問題需要解決(稅率, 語言, etc.) 這就需要有公司來做整合的動作. 這種跨境, 也可以想像是omnichannel的一種呈現.

Harley Finkelstein (President of Shopify): "I mean I think commerce in 2021 is cross-border."

🌻SPAC熱潮退卻，初創市值蒸發750億美元
"SPAC熱潮已經退卻。分析顯示，在2月中旬以前完成合併的137家SPAC的總市值已經蒸發25%，市值回落幅度上個月一度超過1,000億美元。"

"像貝萊德(BlackRock Inc., BLK)和富達投資(Fidelity Investments Inc.)這類企業管理的基金，以及許多對沖基金、養老金管理公司和其他一些投資者，都在SPAC的回落中遭受了衝擊，他們在去年年底開始的熱潮中競相投資SPAC。其中許多基金由於在價格還很低的時候就早早入場，所以現在仍坐擁可觀收益。事實上，SPAC市值仍有約2,500億美元，高於一年前的約1,000億美元，反映出這期間股價上漲和新公司上市的影響。

但即便如此，今年年初令人炫目的回報還是讓許多後來者做了接盤俠，扎堆投資所謂穩賺不賠的領域，其永恆的風險可見一斑。在過去的幾個月裡，一些投資者眼睜睜看著帳面財富縮水。"

"股價下跌會在SPAC領域形成惡性循環，因為投資者有權在併購交易前從空白支票公司撤資。一旦SPAC跌破發行價，投資者就更有可能這樣做，而許多SPAC的股價現在正處於這樣的水平。目前，在尚未宣布併購交易的空白支票公司中，超過95%的公司股價低於發行價。

投資者的大規模撤資會讓已經上市的空白支票公司手上的現金大幅減少，讓其更難實現業務目標，並可能加劇股價跌勢。"

https://on.wsj.com/3n6JznC

🌻BNPL (buy now pay later)
But most BNPL providers including Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay have been losing money despite breakneck revenue growth as they invest heavily in marketing to win share. Sweden-based Klarna’s credit losses more than doubled in the second quarter. Affirm has projected adjusted operating losses of $50m-$55m for the fiscal year that ended June 30.

The path to profitability for many of these companies was to achieve massive scale, analysts said.

https://www.ft.com/content/ca201a37-a16d-4223-b123-04d38350a972

Pictures: 一葉知秋; from EarningsWhispers

🌻本周做的閱讀與功課:
https://makingsenseofusastocks.blogspot.com/2021/08/blog-post_26.html

這周的功課有些落後. 之後可能會補東西進去. 不過重點就是這兩天的Jackson Hole 會議, 以及下周的非農.

🌻近期整理好的一些財報電話會議內容, 我會陸續放到部落格那邊. 請有興趣的讀者自行去找找. 如果還沒放上, 那就是還在進行中.

🌻Snowflake (SNOW) earnings analysis by Morgan Stanley
這家的熱度很高, 不過我沒有在follow. 下面是Morgan Stanley對於SNOW這次的財報, 所給予的評價. 供有興趣的讀者參考.

Snowflake Delivers a Solid Raise to Go Along With the Beat, as Visibility into Customer Expansion Improves. Another quarter of triple-digit product revenue growth (103% vs. 110% in 1Q22), came in 6% ahead of consensus, enabled by a set of underlying business metrics that remain best-in-class in enterprise software, including: 1) 169% net-revenue retention, which improved from 168% in Q1, 2) 60% YoY growth in total customers and 3) 107% YoY growth in customers spending in excess of $1 million in product revenue. More importantly, for the first time as a public company, management raised guidance in excess of the quarterly beat and ahead of consensus with the high end 3Q/FY22 product revenue guidance coming 5%/3% ahead of consensus. This reflects management's greater visibility into the consumption patterns of large customers – a fact underscored by CFO Mike Scarpelli reiterating expectations for 160%+ net revenue retention for the balance of the year. Furthermore, the company appears to be advancing its position beyond a cloud data warehouse, as evidenced by early traction in new areas including SnowPark (modern data pipelines), security analytics, machine learning and data exchange. The one area of controversy coming out of Q2 results was the sharp deceleration in RPO, which slowed to 122% YoY from 206% the prior quarter. However, we note that RPO growth was negatively impacted by the lapping of longer contract durations and a tough compare from the ~$100 million, 3-year deal with a large customer in the year ago period. Management noted that growth in new annualized contract value accelerated versus 2Q21. Overall, we are encouraged by Snowflake's meaningful beat and raise, and take our PT to $295. However, with shares trading 54x revenue (0.67x rev growth-adjusted), we look for a pull back to generate a better risk/reward profile.

🌻美國很有名的一位"farm-influencer", 鄉村部落客, 專門描述農村&田園的部落客: https://www.instagram.com/hcneeleman/

WSJ前幾天有篇文章, 是講現在的一個美國次文化(鄉村/農村文化farm culture). 加上疫情後, 很多人搬到鄉村或是郊區, 讓這樣的文化更盛行了起來. 相關個股是連鎖零售店Tractor Supply (TSCO)以及鞋店Boot Barn (BOOT).

https://www.wsj.com/articles/instagram-stars-make-farm-life-look-delightfulminus-the-manure-11629733123

Pictures: Tractor Supply內部照片

【近日股市資金行情之我見】

這兩個月忙著跨海搬家，沒太多時間寫長文。這篇文章從今年1月斷斷續續寫到現在，主要嘗試回答兩個問題：

1. 2021年初是否存在市場過熱現象？

2. 美國政府2020年的瘋狂印鈔行為（參見下圖）是否會引發嚴重通貨膨脹？投資人應該如何因應？



首先關於第一個問題，在今年2月份我們看到美國股市的option契約數量大增，從19M/每日增加至30M/每日；SPACs形式2020年增加200件，募資$74B；GME軋空炒作行情。

這樣是否存在擦鞋童現象？

這部分我想先回顧17世紀荷蘭鬱金香投機事件。

傳說當年荷蘭鬱金香莖球被瘋狂炒作，價格上漲幾百倍，荷蘭舉國人民紛紛陷入投機熱潮，甚至20世紀德國知名投資客柯斯多蘭尼稱當年有駝背侏儒光是出租其後背供投資客們寫上最金莖球價格，然後穿梭人群中賺了一小筆。

隨後鬱金香莖球炒作泡沫破裂，荷蘭國家經濟受到重創，進而影響當年曾是海上商業王國的地位。

然而史實是如此嗎？

美國經濟學家Peter Garber專門研究此一投機炒作的經濟史，並寫下幾篇著名論文。而依據其著作"Famous First Bubbles The Fundamentals of Early Manias" 一書，我整理幾個重點：

1. 實際上鬱金香熱潮時間相當短，價格明顯彈升發生在1636年11月～1637年1月份。

2. 參與人數總共約350人，全是職業商人；真正支付高價（超過300荷蘭盾）者約莫10人，多數人其實是透過遠期合約的方式進行炒作，而最後多以違約拒絕真實支付現金，直到荷蘭當地鬱金香相關商會與政府出面介入，才以履約價格的10%甚至5%方式解除合約。

3. 非常昂貴的品種，如Semper Augustus 的真實漲幅只有5倍（從原本的1千出頭荷蘭盾漲至5千多），並非都市傳說中幾百倍的漲幅。

漲幅較大的主要是那些本來就平價的品種，例如Gouda buds，起漲價格約２荷蘭盾，最高價50多荷蘭頓。即便存在瘋漲，但至多也是一、二十倍，這即便放在現代農產品供需失調時的價格軌跡來比較，也並不離奇。例如台灣颱風後的香菜價格漲幅。

這邊可以題外話說明為何Semper Augustus這品種售價昂貴。因為這特殊品種本不存在於大自然，而是農夫必須將快開花的鬱金香球莖人工嫁接罹患某種病毒的鬱金香，才能開出特殊花色。而這種嫁接病毒的球莖將會死亡，不再具備繁衍後代的能力。此外，嫁接後的成功率在當年也並不高，不保證存活也不保證開出特殊花色。

物以稀為貴下使得Semper Augustus這品種本來售價就高昂，是一般品種的百倍。

讀者可參見以下幾張當年不同品種的價格走勢圖：

4. 也因為這個事件的範圍與熱潮都比傳說中小得多，因此並未對實質荷蘭資本市場或經濟體造成多少負面影響。

荷蘭鬱金香泡沫事件有三點啟示：

a. 即便在當年差不多時期的著作、媒體都有對其瘋狂投機炒作的描述，但實證來看誇大成分居多。很可能受到作家喜歡站在道德高點批判投機行為的習慣影響，但做為投資人或經濟史研究者在考據曾經的泡沫事件，始終必須以事實為依歸。

b. 小範圍小規模的投機炒作，無論價格哄抬得多麼高聳入天，事實是「毀約」始終是一種選項，有行無市的價格不存在經濟學意義。

c. 同樣地，小範圍小規模的投機炒作，無論價格哄抬得多麼高聳入天，對整體經濟乃至於資本市場的影響同樣不會太大。這意味著我們雖然應該警醒擦鞋童現象，但也無需杯弓蛇影。

如同我在去年幾篇文章中談到的，我認為Covid-19疫情本身造成的經濟損害遠不如人為的隔離措施所造成。目前看到的全世界生產力衰退，人禍成分高過天災。但與2009年不同之處在於：

「Personal savings soared as high as 33.7% in April following the Cares Act and were still a healthy 13.7% in December before Congress passed another $900 billion in Covid aid. This means that, unlike during the 2009 recession, households aren’t weighed down by debt.
Personal bankruptcies, home foreclosures and loan delinquencies last fall were the lowest since at least 2003. The mortgage delinquency rate was 0.7% in the third quarter of 2020 compared to 7% in the first quarter of 2009. ...」

出自Wrong Stimulus, Wrong Time - WSJ （ Feb. 5, 2021）報導。

因此在我看來，此文撰寫的時間點，雖然多多少少某些類股上存在擦鞋童現象，投資人不必過度擔憂。投資人真正該做好未雨綢繆準備的，是美國瘋狂印鈔下必然到來的嚴重通貨膨脹。

問題二：通貨膨脹下股票標的如何選擇？

高資產或高負債的公司在嚴重通膨時期的股價表現優於高現金部位的公司。在經濟學大師Armen A. Alchian 1965年的論文 "Effects of Inflation Upon Stock Prices "中，特別指出傳統經濟學如凱因斯、費雪等著名學者之見認為銀行身為典型債務人，在通貨膨脹環境下應該有較好的股價表現。而Alchian則點出這些學者大老忽略銀行雖然集債務於一身（大眾存款之於銀行就是債務），然而銀行受限於法規與現實，其資產多是「現金資產（money-type assets）」，故在嚴重通貨膨脹影響下，銀行實際經濟損失大過通膨泡沫所得，股價表現當然好不到哪去。

Alchian此文對我的啟發甚大，揭櫫面對貨幣因素影響甚大時的投資方向。

但我們要知道Armen Alchian的論文寫作時期與如今的投資環境又有幾個重大侷限條件之不同，因此我們不能生吞活剝地硬套Alchian的觀點，而是必須真實理解背後隱含的正確經濟學邏輯，並依據當今侷限條件之不同而修改並應用。

引入費雪的利息理論與張五常的財富倉庫概念，現今世界何謂資產、何謂債權債務、何謂現金？我們必須要能超脫會計學、法學的思維侷限，而從真正在投資決策上有效益的經濟學角度切入。

一個我認為值得投資人注意的重點是：投資人對於高商譽（goodwill）的公司能否有正確地、在經濟學層面的深度理解與評價機制。

這點同樣也適用在面對新科技寵兒如電動車之流之正確價格評估。

以長期投資角度看，如果以夠低的成本入手高資產或高品牌價值公司，本身部位又很大，則隨後的股市大幅修正甚至崩盤基本可以無視

如果部位不大，則可以視隨後散戶瘋狂狀況逐漸增加現金部位。

回到現實面，我認為通膨現象確實在發生，有兩個現象值得注意：

a. 機構法人買入加密貨幣的金流增加

「...JPMorgan, said the size of the bitcoin market had grown to equal about a fifth of gold held for investment and trading purposes, with a market capitalisation for the cryptocurrency of $750bn at its peak earlier this year, meaning it “is far from a niche asset class”. 」

「...Analysts at Canadian insurance company Manulife said in late January that the expansion in central banks’ balance sheets and rising public debt would push investors further into alternative asset classes ...」

「...Xangle showing that investors have lost more than $16bn to fraud since 2012 ...」

b. 近日美國美國前25大銀行對私人之貸款佔總資產比例從去年54.1%下降之45.7%，且放在Fed reserve account總金額達$3.15兆美元。

（The 25 largest U.S. banks currently hold 45.7% of their assets in loans and leases, according to Fed data released Friday, down from 54.1% this time last year. .. reserve balances in their Federal Reserve depository accounts at sky-high levels, $3.15 trillion at present
）

通膨現象將會更嚴重，因為「...According to a recent House Budget Committee estimate, $1 trillion from last year’s bills hasn’t been spent—including $59 billion for schools, $239 billion for health care and $452 billion in small business loans. State and local governments added 67,000 jobs in January. They don’t need more federal cash. ...」
WSJ "wrong-stimulus-wrong-time " Feb. 5, 2021

如同我在「論比特幣」一文中闡述過：比特幣顯然不是被當作交易貨幣而是某種無根財富倉庫，因此其價格之暴漲暴跌均同時具備「合理與不合理」之雙面性。因為不存在適當的評價方式去推估其價格之合理性。

但在此文我想進一步指出，從另一層面來看，這種無根倉庫的價格變動本身卻可提供我們對於貨幣因素下真實通貨膨脹的現狀診斷。這好比我們切脈在左關中層把得一數滑脈，搭配右關心位或肝位的脈相，或胃經、肝經或經外奇穴的壓痛診斷，或舌診眼診等等訊息，我們可以推知患者是肝臟、胰臟有惡性腫瘤亦或慢性胃潰瘍。

比特幣的暴漲本身也是一個類似性質的市場訊號。

換言之，當我們把貨幣看做經濟體的血液/體液時，投資人懂不懂得把經濟的脈？是否可以從貨幣的脈相得知經濟血液/體液的品質、健康度、病理變異方向程度與進程...等等。當我們脈診上發現血液/體液堆積於某經絡時，我們看到某類型資產價格飛漲甚至軋空時，診斷者有沒有能力正確推測隨後的、不同時間點地病程發展與相對應的症狀發作？

中美貿易戰框架與因應Covid-19疫情的政府舉措則是結構性地在解剖學層面改變經濟體本身，所需要的制度經濟學知識又是否足夠投資人能趨吉避凶甚或從中獲利？

這些都是參與投資市場者必須時時捫心自問的問題。

我文末再強調一次：美國主要銀行減少對私人企業放款而增加手中政府債券這現象。

參考：

Financial Times "Bitcoin boom backstopped by central banks’ easy-money policies" 2021/2/4

Financial Times "US mortgage executives forecast a $3tn year in 2021 " 2021/01/08

WSJ "For One GameStop Trader, the Wild Ride Was Almost as Good as the Enormous Payoff " 2021/02/03

Armen A. Alchian, "Effects of Inflation Upon Stock Prices" (1965)

Peter M. Garber, Famous First Bubbles The Fundamentals of Early Manias (2000）

WSJ, "Fed Policy Is Smothering Private Lending" (2021/03/08)

文章連結：
https://ppt.cc/f7YCNx

#網購文具 #居家 #宅在家網購
舖米 Pumi
IG：PumiˍJournal (https://www.instagram.com/pumi_journal/)
Blog：https://pumijournal.blogspot.com/
E-mail：pumiii2018@gmail.com
影片禁止轉載、二改、商用

非合作影片，購買：QUEEN SHOP https://www.queenshop.com.tw/
身材159/45，歡迎參考～

00:00 今日主題
00:44 馬卡龍腳趾 聯名T
02:24 馬卡龍腳趾 襪子
03:32 馬卡龍腳趾 筆記本、貼紙
05:22 中分哥 小包包
06:25 兩件舒適短袖襯衫
09:00 短袖西裝外套

看更多穿搭｜
👉夏季台拍PAZZO開箱💕在家網購服飾還能買「貼紙」⁉ ｜舖米Pumi
https://youtu.be/ByjoBJOGWd4
👉涼爽一夏💙2020年夏季KPOP女團穿搭💙｜女團偶像穿搭｜(G)I-DLE｜Weeekly｜Cherry Bullet｜Oh My Girl｜SOYOU｜韓系穿搭｜夏季OUTFITS｜舖米Pumi
https://youtu.be/Wy4zCe8r548
👉🍂秋季2020女團KPOP潮流穿搭🍂5套日常韓系穿搭｜女團偶像穿搭｜韓系穿搭｜秋季OUTFITS｜Fall Outfits 2020｜舖米Pumi
https://youtu.be/h8p4jSK58tY
👉變身愛的迫降尹世理💖8套2020KPOP韓國流行穿搭！｜韓劇穿搭｜女團偶像穿搭｜IZ*ONE｜GFriend｜梨泰院Class｜趙以瑞穿搭｜尹世理穿搭｜2020春季穿搭｜舖米Pumi
https://youtu.be/YckwYaD2EM0
👉2020冬天穿什麼？一起交換二手衣、三套韓系秋冬穿搭！feat. @1GGO @OB 歐蓓粒 @窩門の百寶袋 ｜舖米Pumi
https://youtu.be/AGoJ-iexdtM
👉冬季KPOP潮流穿搭❄5套日常韓系穿搭｜女團偶像穿搭｜韓系穿搭｜冬季OUTFITS｜Ｗinter Outfits 2020｜舖米Pumi
https://youtu.be/lEVPFLMK9Yg

樂曲提供：Production Music by http://www.epidemicsound.com

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dw_kid12/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepwebkid/?modal=admin_todo_tour
訂閱: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKC6E5s6CMT5sVBInKBbPDQ?sub_confirmation=1

暗網? 陰謀論?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5RVLpFkAKQ&list=PLGzW5EwcApFuqKoowMHS9v8W34vIPyrtk

鬼故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4rmkFI1ik0&list=PLglqLngY6gv5BCwaoP-q6DOwUmw1lIusF

我的100K成長故事: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdhtp6A6YJE

破解Kate yup事件是假的! 不是綁架! 不要被騙! (Facebook上的證據): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NJVt56ORWo&t=2s

曼德拉效應: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMutzRIE_uE&list=PLglqLngY6gv5BCwaoP-q6DOwUmw1lIusF&index=17&t=5s

深刻個人經歷: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Roa6Vs1qWc&list=PLglqLngY6gv4mm_doLUUJx4zq5KvLJ2VE

用24小時學流利的印度話| 揭露學習15大方法 (用$20請騙子補習老師)

挑戰24小時學流利的印度話 (請了騙子老師!!!)

挑戰24小時學一個新語言 (請了騙子老師!!!)

我挑戰24小時內學會印度話!!! (請了騙子老師)

我24小時內學會印度話!!! (請了騙子老師)

BB仔時發出ee oo聲, 原來是世界各地各種語言.



長大後我們母語才因為環境因素而慢慢會建立.

所以其實小時候的我們已經是精通所有語言的天才bb!


有報導指2024年印度將會成為全球最多人口的國家. 而我住的城市一向都是很多印度人的.

所以我要學印度話, 我覺得對於我4年後的將來也會好有幫助.

今次評價成功的準則就是24小時後, 到我小時候常常去吃飯的印度餐廳用印度話order到一餐. 而要他們以為我真的是印度人.

Day 1

(學習口音)

Ok, 我們的口音學到了一點點. 但學一種新語言, 最重要的根基還是學基本詞匯

Su=shoe

Police=polise

Hindi (印地話) 是印度語言裡面最出名的. 相信也是最簡單. 30分鐘應該就可以. (Show learn Hindi in 30 minutes)

NamasTe=你好

Meraa naam= 我的名字是

hai= 存在

aap se milkar khushi hui= 很高興認識你

DHanyavaaD= 謝謝

bahuT= 很多

svaagat hai= 不用客氣

Phir milenge= 再見

haan= 是

thodi bahut= 一點點

因為印度跟香港一樣曾有一段很長的時間是英國籍民地.


Hindi本身分開兩種說話方式

如果要跟一些印度本地居民用言語溝通, 可以用 ‘Urdu’ 即是比較俚語一點的. 正式一點的埸合就需要用sanskrit, 書面語.

這個知識好重要, 因為之後叫東西吃幾多個份量一定要講清楚.


但我覺得在此學生字這些不能確定自己能100%完成到叫外賣這個任務. 所以我決定網上聘請一個私人美女導師幫一幫手.



我就去睡一睡先.



發現印度語跟中文很相似的地方是喜歡用portmanteau. 即是將兩個字合為一個全新的意思.

像印度話?面 ‘phir milenge’ 是再見的意思. 第一個Phir的意思是 ‘再一次’ 而milenge是 ‘我們會見面.

再一次, 我們會見面.



每一個語言字和意思的結構都是不同

Hindi一個句子的結構是 (subject) (object) (verb) 名詞/形容詞...




I want to make a food order

Main, ek khaana ordar karana chaahata hoon

(I). 1 Food order). (I want to one)



我就想叫這個Tandoori Lamb champ,



Main tandoree memne chaimpiyan ordar karana chaahata hoon



大家可以看到比之前只是要 ‘food order’ 少了 “ek” 作天學到的1數目字. 但句字的前後也是一樣的.



我覺得聆聽比只懂得講話來得更重要.



(需要懂得聽到的印度話)



救命: bachao

一定: nishchit hee

歡迎: Aapaka svaagat hai

嘩: Vaah!


Namaste

Main, ek khaana ordar karana chaahata hoon

Main tandoree memne chaimpiyan ordar karana chaahata hoon

Yah kitane ka hai (how much is it)
Ok! Phir milenge!


（watch Slumdog millionaire)
-貧民窟里的百萬富翁


開始做暗網仔其中一樣最叻的事, 就是看歷史.




早於5萬5千年前人類已經居住印度. Hindi印地話公元7世紀開始出現. 今時今日所講的Hindi來自新德里, 而1948年印度政府獨立後, 1949年9月14號印地話正式成為印度的官方語言, 推翻之前英國政府所定的Urdu語言.



為了讓自己今晩能跟dou si有最好的接觸: 我決定買了Hindi最出名的人生哲學書 ‘the monk who sold his Ferrari’ 講一個訴訟律師25歲方hei職業然後往喜馬拉雅山的洗dik心ling之lui.



(Say some parts of the book)

The constant pressure and exhaughsting schedule of a world class trial lawyer had also broken his most important- and perhaps most human-endowment: his sprit.



(Then use those words in sentence grammars)





Namaste adhyaapak! mai merra naam暗網仔 aap se milkar khushi hui



Hi teacher my name is...nice to meet you)



Namaste mahoday, main ek aadesh banaana chaahata hoon


[How to write hindi 印地語]



我真心覺得學寫印度話識一點簡單的英文比較容易翻譯.

原來印度話的重要發音是 ‘a’ 聲. 差不多所有的字都會有這個發音.



表演時間!!!


印度話另一樣特色就是用一clothesline (晾衣繩) 連起每一個字

其實經歷過這3天我最大的感受是看到以前讀書的自己. 第一天開始總是精力充沛, 但真正學到的東西都是最表面的東西. 也當然喜歡玩.


其實我之前在日本住了幾個月. 之後常常後悔一句日文也沒有學到. 只是用英文跟其他人溝通. 但現在我覺得...不學也ok. 因為我學習能應該只是很一般!

用24小時學流利的印度話 (請了騙子補習老師!!!)