關於 one art analysis ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

Elevating a beautiful smile into a perfect one is a form of art which requires proper planning and design. 💎

In this case where the smile is already beautiful, we had fun brainstorming on how to make it perfect out of patient’s request. 🦷

To achieve this result:
Smile Design • In-Office Dental Whitening • No-Prep Composite Veneers

This beautiful patient requested for a fuller smile which looks good from all angles while looking natural. It’s great to have patients as such as my personal favourite smile is one that is aesthetic, but natural at the same time.😁

Having no veneers done before and an existing healthy dentition state, we decided to go for no-prep composite veneers to be conservative. (She’s happy when she’s told that we don’t have to grind down her teeth!)😂

After in-office whitening, we started on her digital smile design, model printing and silicone template fabrication ( @acme.onlinemall Zhermack elite glass silicone, for those who are wondering).
It is followed by the placement of 8-units composite veneers with injection molding technique with @gc_malaysia G-aenial Universal Injectable Composite (Shade A1) and @dental2u composite instruments.

Taking in consideration of the facial composition (yes, your face and teeth should be in harmony!), Incisal embrasure space, tooth dimensions and more, we are able to elevate her smile into a better one. I’ll be sharing some of the analysis I take into consideration in my future posts. :)

Special thanks to my mentor dr @hakienoon for teaching me digital smile design & guiding me in my smile makeover clinical journey!

#SmileMakeover #Composite #Veneers #CompositeVeneers #InjectableComposite #CompositeInjection #CeramicVeneers #Aesthetic #Dentistry #AestheticDentistry #Smile #Dental #牙贴片 #树脂牙贴片 #陶瓷牙贴片 @ Subang Dental Specialist Clinic

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

加$1蚊就有兩杯!🤑
這兩天內前往 #尖沙咀 K11的Tea Express Bar by Jrink, 加$1蚊就可以同款飲料有兩杯😲
<芝士草莓幫幫🍓> $42 + $1 = 2x🍹!! 草莓冰沙加入了紅茶, 上面還有奶蓋😋 店舖主張所有飲品少糖, 所以甜味適中👍 淡淡的茶香還有奶蓋襯托, 草莓愛好者萬勿錯過!
Pay just an extra $1HKD for one more cup of Jrink?!🤑 실화냐?!
Visit @tebbyjrink in #TsimShaTsui K11 asap for this deal of a century😎 Just an extra ONE dollar will land you another cup of the same Jrink🍹
Pretty sure the deal makes everything taste better😂 but here's the analysis: Strawberry Slush is infused with tea and topped with Milk Foam🍼 A great combo! The shop is also determined in making low-sugar bevs, so sweetness level was perfect👌
---------------
📍尖沙咀K11商場2樓 Tsim Sha Tsui K11 Art Mall Level 2

I found an old, 10-year old file of me speaking Japanese on my computer. Here is my analysis of everything that went wrong.

Is this your first time reading one of my video descriptions? Welcome to the secret club :D. Scroll down for more info and a secret message...


- - - - - - - - S I M I L A R V I D E O S - - - - - - - -
"Japanese Study Game" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EZtnkBLEmM
"Review on the N2 Level" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8mtlHBJ1BU

- - - - - - - - D I S C O U N T S !!! - - - - - - - -
http://tinyurl.com/p8pxl87 ← Japanese Learning on iTalki!
Click this for a Buy 1 Get 1 Free Language lesson with the teacher of your choice. (You get a discount, and I get a commission!)

NINJA WIFI provider:
http://tinyurl.com/j9tc2fh
Cheap Pocket WiFi for your next trip in Japan. Link above gives you a discount at checkout!

JAPANESE STATIONERY
Discount code: KEMUSHI10 for 10% off your first stationery box with My Bungu Box
https://www.mybungubox.com/


- - - - - - - - S U B S C R I B E - - - - - - - -
My Second Channel: https://tinyurl.com/yb88ob94
Me: https://www.youtube.com/user/kemushichan

- - - - - - - - H O W T O R E A C H M E - - - - - - - -
http://www.instagram.com/KemushiJP
http://www.facebook.com/KemushiChan
http://www.twitter.com/KemushiJP


- - - - - - - - M Y M A I L B O X - - - - - - - -
Send me messages or whatever you want via the address below!:

Yummy Japan - KemushiChan
〒150-0022 東京都渋谷区恵比寿南2-1-2 R・K・F恵比寿ビル5F

Yummy Japan - KemushiChan
5F, RKF-EBISU, 2-1-2, Ebisuminami, Shibuya-ku,
Tokyo, 150-0022, Japan


Business Inquiries:
Hello@KemushiChan.com
　
- - - - - - - - F A Q - - - - - - - -
Hi! My name is Loretta, a girl from the U.S. who moved to Japan! I'm here on the MEXT scholarship program as a graduate student, studying to get a Masters in Business Administration. Here are some answers to common questions:

1. Do I Speak Japanese? Yep! I was taught formally in High School and have been speaking now for over 15 years.
2. What are you studying? I'm a student in a Japanese "Masters of Business Administration Program"
3. How old are you?: http://tinyurl.com/y7xqqse2
4. How did you get into Japanese school?: http://tinyurl.com/yb8yylch
5. What camera equipment do you use?: I film my videos with a Canon 60D using a 30mm Sigma Art Lens and I edit with Sony Vegas Pro 10 (with some help from photoshop).


- - - - - - - -　♬M U S I C I N T H I S V I D E O♬ - - - - - - - -
♪ "Covert Affair Film Noire" - YouTube Audio Library
♪ "The Entertainer" - YouTube Audio Library
♪ "Animaux Obscenes" - YouTube Audio Library


Whoa now, who's this at the bottom of the description? If you made it to this message, let me know by leaving a comment below! Today's secret comment is.....
What is a recent word you've struggled with in a second language?

#university #react #japanese

I found an old, 10-year old file of me speaking Japanese on my computer. Here is my analysis of everything that went wrong.

Is this your first time reading one of my video descriptions? Welcome to the secret club :D. Scroll down for more info and a secret message...


- - - - - - - - S I M I L A R V I D E O S - - - - - - - -
"Japanese Study Game" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EZtnkBLEmM
"Review on the N2 Level" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8mtlHBJ1BU

- - - - - - - - D I S C O U N T S !!! - - - - - - - -
http://tinyurl.com/p8pxl87 ← Japanese Learning on iTalki!
Click this for a Buy 1 Get 1 Free Language lesson with the teacher of your choice. (You get a discount, and I get a commission!)

NINJA WIFI provider:
http://tinyurl.com/j9tc2fh
Cheap Pocket WiFi for your next trip in Japan. Link above gives you a discount at checkout!

JAPANESE STATIONERY
Discount code: KEMUSHI10 for 10% off your first stationery box with My Bungu Box
https://www.mybungubox.com/


- - - - - - - - S U B S C R I B E - - - - - - - -
My Second Channel: https://tinyurl.com/yb88ob94
Me: https://www.youtube.com/user/kemushichan

- - - - - - - - H O W T O R E A C H M E - - - - - - - -
http://www.instagram.com/KemushiJP
http://www.facebook.com/KemushiChan
http://www.twitter.com/KemushiJP


- - - - - - - - M Y M A I L B O X - - - - - - - -
Send me messages or whatever you want via the address below!:

Yummy Japan - KemushiChan
〒150-0022 東京都渋谷区恵比寿南2-1-2 R・K・F恵比寿ビル5F

Yummy Japan - KemushiChan
5F, RKF-EBISU, 2-1-2, Ebisuminami, Shibuya-ku,
Tokyo, 150-0022, Japan


Business Inquiries:
Hello@KemushiChan.com
　
- - - - - - - - F A Q - - - - - - - -
Hi! My name is Loretta, a girl from the U.S. who moved to Japan! I'm here on the MEXT scholarship program as a graduate student, studying to get a Masters in Business Administration. Here are some answers to common questions:

1. Do I Speak Japanese? Yep! I was taught formally in High School and have been speaking now for over 15 years.
2. What are you studying? I'm a student in a Japanese "Masters of Business Administration Program"
3. How old are you?: http://tinyurl.com/y7xqqse2
4. How did you get into Japanese school?: http://tinyurl.com/yb8yylch
5. What camera equipment do you use?: I film my videos with a Canon 60D using a 30mm Sigma Art Lens and I edit with Sony Vegas Pro 10 (with some help from photoshop).


- - - - - - - -　♬M U S I C I N T H I S V I D E O♬ - - - - - - - -
♪ "Covert Affair Film Noire" - YouTube Audio Library
♪ "The Entertainer" - YouTube Audio Library
♪ "Animaux Obscenes" - YouTube Audio Library


Whoa now, who's this at the bottom of the description? If you made it to this message, let me know by leaving a comment below! Today's secret comment is.....
What is a recent word you've struggled with in a second language?

#speakingjapanese #react #japanese

Click Here To Download A Free Copy Of Dan's Book To Get More Of His Secrets: http://readanyone.danlok.link

How do you read anyone? In this video, Dan Lok and his Executive Director, Desmond Soon reveal how to read anyone. Reading anyone is important in both business and in your personal life. It is the ability to read people's influence and understand how they're thinking. Watch this video to discover how to read people.

✒️Click Here to read the blog article✒️
https://danlok.com/how-to-read-people-mastering-the-winning-edge-in-negotiations/

★☆★ SUBSCRIBE TO DAN'S YOUTUBE CHANNEL NOW ★☆★
https://www.youtube.com/danlok?sub_confirmation=1

Check out these Top Trending Playlist:
1.) How to Sell High Ticket Products & Services: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEmTTOfet46PlgDZSSo-gxM8ahZ9RtNQE

2.) The Art of High Ticket Sales - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEmTTOfet46NufVkPfYhpUJAD1OBoQEEd

3.) Millionaire Mindset - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEmTTOfet46O591glMGzRMoHaIJB-bQiq

Dan Lok, a.k.a. The King of High-Ticket Sales is one of the highest-paid and most respected consultants in the luxury and “high-ticket” space.

Dan is the creator of High-Ticket Millions Methodology™, the world's most advanced system for getting high-end clients and commanding high fees with no resistance.

Dan works exclusively with coaches, consultants, thought leaders and other service professionals who want a more sustainable, leveraged lifestyle and business through High-Ticket programs and Equity Income.

Dan is one of the rare keynote speakers and business consultants that actually owns a portfolio of highly profitable business ventures.

Not only he is a two times TEDx opening speaker, he's also an international best-selling author of over 12 books and the host of Shoulders of Titans show.

Dan's availability is extremely limited. As such, he's very selective and he is expensive (although it will be FAR less expensive than staying where you are).

Many of his clients are seeing a positive return on their investments in days, not months.

But if you think your business might benefit from one-on-one interaction with Dan, visit http://danlok.com



★☆★ WANT TO OWN DAN'S BOOKS? ★☆★
http://www.amazon.com/Dan-Lok/e/B002BLXW1K

★☆★ NEED SOLID ADVICE? ★☆★

Request a call with Dan:
https://clarity.fm/danlok


★☆★ CONNECT WITH DAN ON SOCIAL MEDIA ★☆★

Blog: http://www.danlok.com/blog/
Podcast: http://www.shouldersoftitans.com/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/danthemanlok
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/danlok/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/danlok
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/danlok
Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Dan-Lok/e/B002BLXW1K

#DanLok #ReadAnyone #BodyLanguage

This video is about How To Read Anyone
https://youtu.be/5sJikcGeuNw
https://youtu.be/5sJikcGeuNw