關於 chinese reunification ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

歐盟今天發布「歐盟-中國」戰略藍圖
https://reneweuropegroup.app.box.com/s/iik40rg3cdg2qzfj493cqixlzh2i9j0b

The EU should support Taiwan 歐盟應支持台灣：

在習近平主席的領導下，北京強化其侵略立場，要求在“一國兩制”框架下實現台灣與中國的統一，以作為與台進行任何對話的前提。

台灣在外交上受到孤立，軍事上受到威脅。歐盟應重新檢視對台接觸政策，並與國際夥伴合作，幫助維護台灣的民主。歐盟應更密切關注兩岸關係，支持促進兩岸對話、合作和建立信任的所有措施。

歐盟和歐盟27個國家的衛生部長應積極支持台灣重新獲得世衛組織觀察員或甚至是更廣泛的會員資格。

歐盟應向前邁進，重新評估與台灣間經貿關係，啟動歐盟與台灣雙邊投資條約的談判。台灣有潛力成為歐盟在ICT產業、生物科技、健康、移動領域的最佳合作夥伴，台灣也可以發揮重要作用在減少歐洲對中國出口的依賴及未來的產業政策等方面。

最後，歐盟應向中國明確表示，當中國攻擊並試圖以武力接管台灣時，將付出什麼樣的代價。把中國排除在SWIFT(環球銀行金融電信協會)之外, 可以做為施壓中國的代價之一。

Under President Xi Jinping, Beijing has intensified its aggressive stance by demanding the reunification of Taiwan with China under the formula of "One country, two systems" as a precondition for any dialogue with the island.

The country finds itself diplomatically isolated and threatened militarily.The EU should revisit its engagement policy with Taiwan and cooperate with international partners in helping sustain democracy in Taiwan. The EU should furthermore closely monitor cross-strait relations and support initiatives aimed at promoting dialogue, cooperation and confidence building between the two sides.

Taiwan is still excluded from full participation in the WHO.The EU and the 27 health ministers of the EU should actively support Taiwan in their efforts to regain the observer status granted to them in the WHO between 2009 and 2016 and support more broadly membership or at least observer status in all other relevant multilateral organisations.

The EU should move forward, re-evaluate its economic and trade relations with Taiwan and launch negotiations for an EU-Taiwan bilateral investment treaty. Taiwan has the potential to become the EU’s top partner in ICT, biotech, health, mobility and Taiwan could play an important role in reducing European dependency on Chinese exports, as well as in its future industrial policy.

Finally, the EU should make clear to China what the costs will be when they attack and attempt to take over Taiwan by force. Excluding China from the SWIFT banking system should be one of the imposed costs.

#Opinion by Lau Sai-leung 劉細良｜"After all, Hong Kong is an international city where the efficacy of “China Model” is limited. I have never queried the inexhaustible resources at the discretion of the national propaganda machine, but in the era of worldwide information revolution that everyone could be a KOL, are these “multi-billion dollar” state-owned cultural enterprises of any use?"

Read more: https://bit.ly/2LqBQ2Y

"香港畢竟是國際城市，「中國模式」成效有限，我從不懷疑國家隊宣傳機器有無窮盡資源，但在全球資訊革命時代，人人可以是KOL時，這些文化央企「千億資產」又有何用呢？"
____________
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP

#AppleDailyENG

Using military threat to achieve peaceful reunification is the only solution to solve the #Taiwan problem, Chinese social commentator Sima Nan claimed in his latest analysis on Weibo.

Read more: https://bit.ly/3oct9rP

內地知名左派網紅司馬南周日（3日）在微博上發表評論影片，稱解決台灣問題只有一條可行之路，就是「逼統」，又稱「冷武統」，即是在「武力逼迫下實現的和平統一」。他強調「這是目前唯一可行之路」，而且大陸可以用這種方式解決台灣問題的時間窗口並不長。
____
📱Download the app:
http://onelink.to/appledailyapp
📰 Latest news:
http://appledaily.com/engnews/
🐤 Follow us on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/appledaily_hk
💪🏻 Subscribe and show your support:
https://bit.ly/2ZYKpHP
#AppleDailyENG

香港回歸（英語：Hong Kong reunification），1947-1997年普遍稱為中國收回香港，術語常稱為香港主權移交（英語：Transfer of sovereignty over Hong Kong）、英語常稱香港交接（英語：Handover of Hong Kong），是指中華人民共和國政府和英國政府透過《中英聯合聲明》作出承諾，中華人民共和國政府於1997年7月1日對香港（包括香港島、九龍和新界）恢復行使主權，聯合王國政府於同日將香港交還給中華人民共和國的歷史事件。1997年7月1日0時0分，香港特別行政區成立，結束近153年的英治時期，並按照《香港特別行政區基本法》落實「一國兩制」、「高度自治」、「港人治港」，以香港特別行政區行政長官為政府首長。大部分華裔香港永久居民不論意願自動獲得中華人民共和國國籍，可申領香港特別行政區護照。每年7月1日公眾假期名為「香港特別行政區成立紀念日」。

《中華人民共和國香港特別行政區維護國家安全法》（《港區國安法》）於2020年6月30日刊憲公布，即日晚上11時生效。

請訂閱channel及按鐘，不斷製作內容發佈。
IG：http://www.instagram.com/jc.post
FB Page：http://www.facebook.com/jc.post1

🔥支付寶打賞：13581883245
🔥王炳忠今日頭條：搜索「王炳忠台灣」
🔥王炳忠臉書粉專：https://www.facebook.com/bingzhong.wang
♦♦♦
“Are you helping or harming us?” This is my serious question to you American politicians, including those in the Trump administration and in the Congress. As the spokesperson for the New Party, one of Taiwan’s political parties, and also a young man who has lived in Taiwan for more than 32 years since my birth, I should tell you that the answer decides our future without doubt. In other words, the very fact I must confirm is whether you support Taiwan independence instead of the One-China policy or just deploy Taiwan as your pawn to bargain with Beijing. To be honest, as you always take it for granted to sacrifice others for your benefits, it is quite important for us to make sure in advance.

As we all know, the US Congress usually tends to challenge China’s sovereignty over Taiwan because of the impact of the military-industrial complex and the lobbies hired by the Taiwan government. The Taiwan Travel Act and the TAIPEI Act are the late instances. However, without the administration’s implementation, these are only lip service. Thus, the administration’s attitude is crucial indeed. So, let’s see the Department of State. As Secretary Pompeo stated last March, the US is now using every tool in its tool kit to prevent China from isolating Taiwan through diplomatic channels. This year, after shifting blames for its neglect of the pandemic prevention by attacking China and the WHO, the Department of State recently expressed support for Taiwan’s participation in the WHA. The above really triggered my curiosity: The establishment of the US-Taiwan formal diplomatic relations is just the most useful tool, isn’t it? Why does the US not use that? Besides, since Taiwan should become a formal member of the UN before entering the WHO, why does the US not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state or the ROC government in Taiwan as the only legal government of China instead of the PRC?

The answer to my question seems that your real intention is not to support Taiwan’s real independence but only to trouble Beijing. Just as Pompeo said at a congressional hearing, the Trump administration’s way of viewing the US-Taiwan relations can consider the threat of China’s rise more than the predecessors, which reveals that Taiwan is only a chess piece for Washington to play with Beijing. Furthermore, since the US has no will to have Taiwan as a formal ally, Taiwan is just a pawn you can sacrifice anytime. Consequently, Taiwan must suffer the worsening of cross-strait relations at our own cost while the US just plays Taiwan to bargain with Beijing for your own interests. The outcome is so predictable that Taiwan should go through a depression for its large economic dependence on mainland China which you are unable and unwilling to make up. Besides, we should even consider the most serious situation that a war occurs in the Taiwan Strait. The scenario of Taiwan military is holding on alone within two to three weeks in order to wait for the US military aid. Nevertheless, as the former AIT chairman Richard Bush said, the implied commitment of the US to come to Taiwan’s defense has never be absolute. In other words, we should risk engaging a war with Beijing resulted from your dangerous game, sacrificing our lives for your lies.

As I already told you earlier, the real threat to the US is not China’s rise but the loss of your self-confidence. Moreover, you have weakened the stability across the Taiwan Strait by inciting Taiwan to deny the 1992 consensus and intervening in Taiwan’s campaign last year, which destroys the status quo and your interests indeed. Certainly, as what Secretary Pompeo has told us, “We lied, we cheated, we stole,” how can we bet our future on the US “glory” of lying, cheating, and stealing? In fact, as you once betrayed us in 1978 even though the ROC government in Taiwan and your government was formal alliance then, it is much easier for you today to abandon us when the deal has been done.

In conclusion, as your government declared plainly in the U.S.-PRC Joint Communique (1972), the US had its interests in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves. Accordingly, since you are not willing to recognize either Taiwan as an independent state or the ROC as the legal government of China, we have no choice but to deal with the question of reunification with Beijing by the Chinese ourselves. Helping instead of harming us, you could stop intervening in the Taiwan question, otherwise it will only strengthen the risk across the Taiwan Strait and put us in jeopardy. Thank you if you release your hands.

The political environment is complicated by the potential for military conflict should Taiwan make overt actions toward de jure independence; it is the official PRC policy to use force to ensure reunification if peaceful reunification is no longer possible, as stated in its anti-secession law, and for this reason there are substantial military installations on the Fujian coast. However, in recent years, the PRC has moved towards promoting peaceful relations, including stronger economic ties, with the current ROC government aimed at unification through the one country, two systems formula or maintaining the status quo under the 1992 Consensus.

On 29 April 2005, Kuomintang Chairman Lien Chan travelled to Beijing and met with Communist Party of China (CPC) Secretary-General Hu Jintao, the first meeting between the leaders of the two parties since the end of the Chinese Civil War in 1949. On 11 February 2014, Mainland Affairs Council Head Wang Yu-chi travelled to Nanjing and met with Taiwan Affairs Office Head Zhang Zhijun, the first meeting between high-ranking officials from either side. Zhang paid a reciprocal visit to Taiwan and met Wang on 25 June 2014, making Zhang the first minister-level PRC official to ever visit Taiwan. On 7 November 2015, Ma Ying-jeou (in his capacity as Leader of Taiwan) and Xi Jinping (in his capacity as Leader of Mainland China) travelled to Singapore and met up, marking the highest-level exchange between the two sides since 1949.

The PRC supports a version of the One-China policy, which states that Taiwan and mainland China are both part of China, and that the PRC is the only legitimate government of China. It uses this policy to prevent the international recognition of the ROC as an independent sovereign state, meaning that Taiwan participates in international forums under the name "Chinese Taipei". With the emergence of the Taiwanese independence movement, the name "Taiwan" has been employed increasingly often on the island.

What is the difference between Mainland China and Taiwan? Come find out and make a choice as to where you'd like to travel or live...

Support me on Patreon: http://www.patreon.com/serpentza
Join me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/winstoninchina
Twitter: @serpentza
Music used: VHS Dreams - Ocean Heights